Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Revealed: How online GP company Babylon can sign up millions of patients

Pulse looks at how the private company was able to launch its scheme

Private GP provider Babylon has caused shockwaves with its plans to sign up patients from across London to its online 'GP at Hand' service.

It has started offering its online GP service on the NHS as a replacement for regular GP practices across London, with plans to expand the service to the rest of England.

Babylon promises that patients will be able to 'book an appointment within seconds' via its smartphone app and have 'a video consultation with an NHS GP typically in under two hours of booking, anytime, anywhere'.

Now, Pulse can reveal that Babylon is working with a GMS practice, and plans to use the Government’s flagship ‘GP Choice’ scheme, which allows GMS practices to sign up patients from outside their traditional boundaries. Crucially, they are allowed to ‘cherry-pick’ such patients.

GP leaders said that this model is a ‘cynical exploitation’ of the GP Choice scheme, and warned that other people would look to replicate it – leaving other practices to deal with more complex patients.

Babylon has been subcontracted to GMS-contracted GP practice Dr Jefferies and Partners, based in Fulham in West London.

Under the arrangement, patients technically join the list of Dr Jefferies and Partner but Babylon has promised that patients who sign up to the practice will have access to its ‘GP at Hand’ service – a video consultation within two hours of reporting their symptoms online.

However, it has advised that patients with frailty, dementia, pregnancy, drug addiction, learning disability and complex mental health problems may be advised to register elsewhere.

Referring to the conditions, the GP at Hand website says: 'To be prudent during the early phase of the rollout, the NHS has suggested that the service may however be less appropriate for people with the conditions and characteristics listed below.'

Dr Jeffries and Partners' business partner Rita Bright told Pulse this did not mean that the practice would 'exclude' patients.

She said: 'Our service is open to anyone within the initial London eligibility area, we don’t exclude people. The NHS has asked us to advise patients with certain conditions to seek advice before registering and our team are on hand to provide that advice.'

She added that based on pilots of the GP at Hand service, 'a broad range of patients' had benefitted from 'being able to see a GP quickly and at the patient’s convenience', including 'elderly patients who find it difficult to get to surgeries because of mobility problems and families with young children'.

However, NHS England (London) suggested that it may be of particular benefit to patients who are ‘digitally confident’ or who find it difficult to access services near where they live. But it added that if a patient has more complex medical conditions, the practice will want to see them in person.

Both the RCGP and BMA criticised the scheme for 'cherry picking' younger, healthier patients, leaving other GP practices to deal with patients requiring more complex care.

Dr Robert Morley, Birmingham LMC executive secretary, said it was 'cynical exploitation' of the GP Choice scheme, which he was sure 'lots of people' will now look to replicate.

He said: 'It stinks, because it’s rotten, and the fact that NHS England appears to be endorsing this is particularly nauseating.'

'The main implication is that practices not signed up to this will lose young and healthy patients on their list whilst becoming relatively more overburdened with sick patients with complex needs.

'The balancing mechanism in terms of the funding/workload mix of their patient list will be lost and these practices will inevitably struggle even more than they are now.'

Health select committee chair, and former GP, Dr Sarah Wollaston said on Twitter that the scheme ‘clearly has implications for wider primary care and will leave other practices with thinner resource to cope with more patients with complex needs’.

A spokesperson for NHS England (London) said: 'This particular GP practice has developed this patient offer which is included as part of their existing standard GMS service for their registered patients. The practice is subject to all the data protection and information security rules applicable to any NHS practice.'

What is the GP Choice scheme?

Under the GP Choice scheme - hailed by the last Government as a ‘significant improvement’ for the NHS - patients can register at any GP practice they want, although it is voluntary for practices to decide whether they take part.

GP practices who do accept patients not living in their area do not have to do their home visits but are still paid as much per patient.

In order to ensure patients registered elsewhere could see a GP if they were too sick to travel from their home or home area, NHS England introduced the special enhanced service.

In areas where take up was poor regional teams instead had to look to other providers to ensure patient safety.

The scheme has attracted widespread criticism from the GP community since it was first floated, with the GPC being successful in delaying its rollout once on patient safety concerns but failing the second time.

Rate this article  (4.5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (44)

  • Is the answer for practices to change their practice boundary to within 10 metres of their front door, then register all patients under the ‘patient choice’ scheme, effectively sticking a middle finger to anyone housebound or who they can’t be assed to see?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is utterly scandalous, the fact that is supported by NHSE speaks volumes. The worried well can have a cosy Skpe chat with a clinician. Meanwhile those that are actually in need of medical care, will of course be best dealt with elsewhere. As with OOH, there be many patients diverted to emergency departments, because you really cannot assess illness without knowing vital signs. Truthfully you would be as well of with Dr google or asking a mate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doctor McDoctor Face

    I am ‘digitally confident’ and I have a two fingered confident response to this morally bankrupt abuse of the system. I hope it fails miserably.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • *

    So tax payers are going to be subsiding a convenient health care add on for the well healed, affluent, digitally savvy metropolitan cafe brigade, all nicely laid on by a wonderful bunch of Drs in the notoriously disadvantaged and over burdened area of Fulham, London. Rubber stamped by their buddies high up in the NHS administration
    I am going to vomit

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Bravo
    Clever , very clever
    When there is a 'will' , there is a 'way'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    "However it has advised that patients with frailty, dementia, pregnancy, drug addiction, learning disability and complex mental health problems should register elsewhere."

    But the practice does not exclude people, oh no.

    Rank mealy mouthed hypocrisy. Sophistry.

    No wonder NHSE is full of it.

    Anyone going to complain? Any legal challenge? Anybody who is frail who gets the bum's rush from this surgery going to go for breach of contract?

    As, if this spreads, why the hell should any practice take on the high users, the frequent fliers, the ones who take the time?

    Is this how the NHS ends?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So patients register with this scheme andrequire home visit...now to do so NHSE has to have a contract in place to see these patient and as a GMS practice this scheme has to provide reasonable needs...... of course if no scheme for HVs in place as round here or patient wont travel to Fulham then this wont work....as for see local GP...well if not registered and at home address local GPs dont have to see

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Surely this is where the BMA and RCgP need to do something (for a change)

    Discrimination law should not let you discriminate against these patients. They should set up a legal challenhe to stop this happening

    This potentially will change the face go primary care in London and other areas.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • RCGP and HSL will do nothing as usual..... will say its contractual and nothing to do wth them.......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    All the technocrats are hyper-anxious to find 'solutions' to crises right now, particularly Londonian ones .That includes those 'solutions' betraying the virtues and social norms traditionally honoured by a big institution like NHS. Yes , there is a statement of 'doing things differently' . But it does not mean renouncing the code we have been serving for long time.If general practice is really , as proclaimed , the jewel of the NHS's crown , these virtues and norms should have even more protection against any ideology for the sake of providing a political solution.

    Confucius was very much emphasising the 'WAY' (道)a regime was governing its people . When it lost the WAY , people suffered and deserted amid all the signs of the times.
    If you look at this government on the whole , you wonder where and what is its WAY?
    The domino effect of faltering offices within the government is astonishing :
    *Home Office led by a Home Secretary plagued by multiple terror attacks around general election arguably related to resource cuts in intelligence and police force by her big boss when she was doing the same job. 'Poor Amber' also had to play 'deputy prime minister' in front of television every time there was a crisis ( as the PM went AWOL so often). Like the US Secretary of State (who constantly found himself contradicted and embarrassed by totally opposite comments against his public announcements, from his big boss ) , I worry that they will soon develop generalised anxiety disorder(GAD). Poor Amber certainly looked really uneasy on TV.
    *Then , MOD when the long established Defence Secretary had to resign in face of this nuclear bomb called 'sexual harassment' just dropped in Westminster. The number of potential casualties in all parties is rising and the devastation to the ruling party and its cabinet is undoubtedly unfathomable.
    *Almost simultaneously, the Foreign Office underwent two bankruptcies of credibility in just a few days . First , you have Foreign Secretary failing to do his homework properly before speaking to the select committee in House of Commons on foreign affairs , now found his comment being used by Iranian government to convict a British-Iranian lady a crime of subversion while she was on holiday with her little daughter since April last year. A sentence of five years or more is now on the table. This is , of course , in addition to numerous embarrassing comments in public made by the Foreign Secretary as well as his arguably treacherous 4000 words essay in Daily Telegraph about Brexit.
    Even worse to the Foreign Office ,the secretary of international development had to resign tonight because of a series of secrert meetings with Israeli politicians during her holidays , without informing the office.

    All these(including the unanswered responsibility questions in Grenfell Tower disaster )happened in merely just five months .
    One can blame to some degree on the distractions from Brexit but the objective conclusion is the government has lost the WAY.
    While we(GPs) have already got used to NOT believe anything said by our longest serving health secretary, you wonder where is trust on this government going to come from? Perhaps , just perhaps , the prime minister does have the 'heart' to do the right things but this political circumstance is certainly beyond her capability to remedy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say