Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

'UK wide agreement' needed to protect GPs from indemnity increases

GP leaders have called for clarity across the UK about whether governments would reimburse practices for expected increases in indemnity costs.

The Department of Health in England has confirmed that it will foot the bill should medical defence fees shoot up in response to increasing costs for lifetime payouts in clinical negligence cases.

But Dr Tom Black, Northern Ireland GPC chair called for a UK wide agreement after receiving no such assurance from officials in Northern Ireland despite general practice facing the exact same problem.

‘Indemnity is the number one short-term risk for the system at the moment,’ he says.

‘We are already seeing significant increases in medical defence payments with some GPs going from annual payments of £8,000 to £12,500.

‘There are already doctors who are reducing out-of-hours work or cutting day time sessions to make ends meet.’

He said the current shortage of GPs would be made worse if doctors were forced to have to move to hospital work where indemnity was covered because they could no longer afford the cost.

In response to the statement Pulse received from the DH in England that funding would be made available should medical defence organisations increase their fees, Dr Black said: ‘We have had no such commitment’.

‘This needs to be solved in the next four to six weeks and we need a solution that is UK wide.’

Scottish GPC chair Dr Alan McDevitt said the decision earlier this year to change the discount rate in Scotland had caused concern among GPs that it will lead indemnity increases as has been predicted for some time in England and Wales.

‘The last thing that GPs in Scotland need now is to be hit with higher indemnity bills and, working closely with GPC UK, we have repeatedly made that clear in discussions with defence unions and the Scottish Government.

He added: ‘The health secretary has previously made clear that she is engaged with this issue and SGPC will continue to strongly make the case to the Scottish Government that they must ensure that any increased costs to GPs will be met in full.’

GPC Wales chair Dr Charlotte Jones said a wide range of options were being looked at solve the problem of rising indemnity costs for GPs in Wales.

Wales currently has a risk pool for doctors working in out of hours services run by health boards which is also available to GPs working in health board managed practices.

When asked if this could be expanded, she said changes to the discount rate meant they were ‘looking at range of indemnity solutions urgently’.

A spokesperson for the Welsh Government said: ‘The Welsh Government is working closely with the English Department of Health and the other devolved administrations to address the impact of increasing GP professional indemnity costs.’

Readers' comments (3)

  • Wales most certainly does NOT have a risk pool for OOHs services that cover the country.

    Powys, which is covered by an English provider (shropdoc), staffed by Welsh GPs at Welsh bases, is ignored repeatedly by Welsh government who refuse to supply us the same cover as the rest of our Welsh OOH colleagues.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A virtual nobody

    We don't actually need Drs in this country. We have google and pharmacists and Skype. That's what the population of the United Kingdom needs. Not Drs...so last century. About as relivant as getting your child immunised. We've moved on...we are smarter now...we all have smart phones with apps and we all use social media. We don't need Drs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agree with DR Skull above. We do not need British GPs. We need to import foreign GPs by robbing other countries, but put a 4 year clause on our doctors. All very very fair and just. Here in NI we send patients to Dublin and Blackrock for operations.
    Import doctors, export patients. Great system.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say