Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP leaders vote to consider withdrawing support for independent pay reviews

LMC leaders have supported a move to withdraw support from the independent pay review body after a series of below inflation pay awards.

According to delegates speaking at the LMCs Conference in York today, the Doctors’ and Dentists’ Review Body (DDRB) decision to recommend only a 0.28% uplift to GP funding this year had translated to a reduction of GP pay, claiming the DDRB was influenced by Government rhetoric on what was affordable.

Proposing the motion, Dr Gill Beck of Buckinghamshire LMC questioned how the recommendation could equate to the claimed 1% increase in take home remuneration.

She said: ‘For the NHSE and the DDRB members, let me help you with your personal development. A 0.28% increase is not a pay rise, is not a pay freeze – if only – it’s another pay cut.’

‘And if these members believe otherwise, then I question their competency and would ask the GPC to explore whether the members of these teams can be helped by remedial education, or whether there is a better alternative.’

Dr Krishna Kasaraneni, a member of the GPC Trainees Subcommittee, said that the DDRB report wasn’t just going to affect current GPs but would deter prospective ones too.

He told the conference: ‘The Government says that all it can afford is a 1% pay rise [so] I take it that the government is happy for general practice to be under recruited.’

‘Of course they are, they recently postponed their mandate with Health Education England [to recruit 3,250 GPs by 2015] till after the next general election is finished. So it’s not just today’s GPs, future GPs are also being stuffed by this Government with their response to the Doctors and Dentists Review body.’

Finally, GPC negotiator and a GP in Derbyshire, Dr Peter Holden, said the idea that the 0.28% increase equated to a ‘pay freeze’ was ‘pure fantasy’.

He said: ‘In terms of “the exploring”, we’re already at it. There’s 157 comments that are not very complimentary about the review body, I’ll leave it in your hands. I think you know which way to go with this.’

As part of the same debate, delegates also deplored plans to publish GP pay - a process set to commence in the summer - as a ‘politically motivated’ decision that ‘panders to the prejudices of ill-informed sections of the media’.

This came despite GPC urging otherwise.

Dr Holden told GPs: ‘What we can hopefully [get] from this is our one opportunity to turn around and say “it is your own figure, Government, [and it] shows that we are on staff grade money, not the Daily Mail plus-£100k [pay], like you keep saying”.’

Click here to read our liveblog

The motions in full (all carried):

BUCKINGHAMSHIRE That conference finds the Doctors’ and Dentists’ Review Board (DDRB) report:

(i) unacceptable as once again GPs are facing a reduction in income not just a pay freeze

(ii) influenced too heavily by the government who claimed a 1% uplift is all that is affordable

(iii) unbelievable as how can a 0.28% increase to expenses translate into a 1% increase to take home remuneration

(iv) incompetent, and asks GPC to explore whether we should continue to participate in the DDRB arrangements.


NOTTINGHAMSHIRE That conference deplores the government’s proposed publication of GPs’ take home pay which it believes:

(i) is politically motivated and panders to the prejudices of ill-informed sections of the media which are avowedly hostile to GPs

(ii) risks creating divisions between GPs and practices, between GPs and other doctors, and between GPs and their patients

(iii) must not be presented in a simplistic way that makes GPs a target for further unfair media criticism

(iv) should only be published once its accuracy has been verified by the GPC and only then in a manner that differentiates between NHS and private income and properly reflects the complexities of GPs’ working arrangements.

Readers' comments (6)

  • Took Early Retirement

    Who cares what the LMC conference says? It is just hot air, contributing to global warming.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with John... why vote to "consider withdrawing support", You vote to withdraw support (or not).

    Our leadership has no teeth and I genuinely think we have past the point of no return for general practice which is on the way out. Anyone considering GP as a career should look elsewhere.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The LMC don't want to support anything that doesn't give them what they ask for - what surprise (not!)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No OOH in December and January. Thanks to Amanda Platell the public now believes GP's don't do weekend work. We have no contractual obligation to undertake it and only if half the OOH workforce participated it would create immense pressure in a short time . The press wouldn't know who to blame because according to the Daily Fail we don't do it anyway . Wins all round . (plus nice holiday over Christmas )

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Most OOH work is now taxed at 60%

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I know most of us don't go into General Practice to make large sums of money but whatever folk might think money talks. When we got the long awaited correction in our incomes in 2004/05 which nearly brought us into line with our consultant colleagues NHS incomes - we felt good as a medical tribe of GPs. General Practice had been lifted up financially to be on a par with our hospital colleagues and I for one felt proud to be a GP once more on an almost equal footing with hospital consultant peers.

    That didn't last long few years and every yeatr since for me has been a pay cut year after year so my last year as a single hander I was back £ for £ to 2002-03 income levels - that is ignoring inflation and cost of living etc.

    MPs incomes and everybody elses have gone up - we are now a long way behind hospital consultants again.

    And we wonder why nobody wants to be a GP on an income from the last decade and those like me who are still around want out.

    Obvious init?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say