This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Great escape: why GPs are drawing pensions at a younger age

A steady increase in younger GPs drawing their pension is causing concern, finds Carolyn Wickware

the great escape cover pulse final 3x2

the great escape cover pulse final 3x2

Jeremy Hunt’s target to ‘train and retain’ 5,000 extra GPs by 2020 seems like an increasingly distant goal. Since the health secretary made this promise, GP numbers have actually fallen by 1,300.

But why? The number of GPs entering training is at its highest-ever level, almost 200 have been tempted back into the profession with the promise of bursaries and easier induction, and the NHS has started bringing in GPs from overseas. But all these efforts have been undermined by one thing – a very leaky bucket.

The Government keeps no official data  on the number of GPs retiring. But for the first time, Pulse can reveal official figures from the NHS pension scheme that highlight an increasing trend towards GPs cashing in their pensions before their retirement age, causing untold damage to workforce projections.

Pulse can reveal that 721 GPs under the age of 60 drew their pensions for the first time in 2016/17 – in 2011/12 this figure was 513. Moreover, the average age of those drawing their pensions for the first time has dropped, from 60.4 years in 2011/12 to 58.5 years in 2016/17. And in some areas this is causing ‘immense pressure’ on those left behind.

There are some caveats to these figures. First, the number of GPs cashing in their pensions each year is falling, with a large decrease in the number of GPs over 60 doing so. However, this could be because so many older GPs retired when the Government first introduced changes to the NHS pensions scheme. Second, drawing pensions doesn’t necessarily mean retiring – many GPs could be taking so-called ‘24-hour retirement’, where they continue to work some sessions while drawing their pension.  

But the BMA’s GP committee pensions lead Dr David Bailey believes most of those retiring early are not taking this option. ‘If you draw your pension before 60 there’s a significant [financial] hit, so I can’t see why you’d want to do that, rather than wait until you can draw it unreduced, unless you’re actually retiring,’ he says ‘A few people are coming back and doing locum work but a significant number of them are just retiring because, apart from anything else, the indemnity costs involved mean a small amount of part-time work is just no longer a feasible option.’

dr anu rao charlesmilligan 3x2

dr anu rao charlesmilligan 3x2

Early retirement is leaving the GP workforce on its knees Dr Anu Rao

GPs retiring report being worn down by the increasing demands of the job, scared of becoming the ‘last (wo)man standing’ or craving a life free of dastardly three-letter acronyms such as CQC or QOF. This trend is having a real impact on the stability of local health services.

Dr Anu Rao, medical officer for Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland LMC, says the increasing number of GPs ‘fortunate enough’ to draw their pension early is leaving ‘a struggling GP workforce on its knees and creates immense pressure on GPs who are currently trying to make general practice work’. In the Yorkshire town of Bridlington, local leaders warn ‘a town without GPs is a very real possibility’, with all six practices in the town having closed their lists. Local GP leaders put this down to GPs retiring early due to unsustainable workload.

Meanwhile, practices across three towns in North Ayrshire have closed their lists to new patients for a year, with a report by the LMC pointing to the higher number of GPs retiring early. Dr Bailey pinpoints the key reason why GPs are retiring early: ‘The cause is the ongoing problem with workload and workforce that we’re seeing and we have seen for a number of years’.

Workload is reaching potentially unsafe levels. A Pulse survey last month revealed GPs have on average 40 patient contacts a day; the European Union of General Practitioners says the safe limit is around 25. The RCGP estimates GPs are seeing 60 million more patients a year than five years ago, while GP numbers have failed to keep pace.

But workload is not the only reason GPs are retiring early. The lifetime allowance for pensions tax relief was brought down from £1.25m to £1m in 2016, meaning for many GPs there is little benefit in continuing to pay into their pension fund – removing one of the main incentives to wait until retirement age. 

Add in the removal of seniority payments, and the pressure of rising indemnity costs and bureaucracy, and you have a cocktail of factors with a corrosive effect on GP numbers

But it could get worse. A BMA survey of 420 GPs in 2014 found that as many as seven out of 10 were considering retiring early because of low morale or ‘unmanageable or unsustainable’ workloads, while a BBC poll of 1,000 GPs in 2015 found 55% would either ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ leave before retirement age.

younger pensions pay outs

younger pensions pay outs

 

Why are GPs retiring early?

Workload

This is the most-cited complaint for early retirees; in a recent survey Pulse found almost half of GPs say their ability to care for patients has been affected by work stress.

Mental health

It’s a significant concern for GPs, with 500 seeking mental health treatment in the first four months of the GP Health Service.

Indemnity

According to the Centre for Policy Studies, the average GP pays £8,000 per year in indemnity costs, which is driving GPs out of the profession. Meanwhile, state-backed indemnity is not due to kick in until 2019.

Taxation

GPs with a gross income of more than £150,000 will have their £40,000 annual tax allowance on pensions contributions tapered down, with accountants advising that this will hit GPs hard in 2018.

Premises

Some GPs are retiring early to avoid a ‘last man standing’ situation, which would see them stuck with premises and staff liabilities and no one to pass it on to.

Seniority pay

Payments worth £8,000 for senior GPs were reduced by the 2014/15 contract deal by 15% a year, ahead of being abolished by 2020.

Regulation

GPC leaders have accused the CQC of subjecting practices to ‘enormous cost, workload and bureaucracy’. GPs have less confidence than other healthcare providers that the regulator is useful.6

More recently, in December 2017, an analysis by the Medical Defence Union calculated that the proportion of GPs who retire before the age of 60 had increased by 18% since 2011, which the indemnity provider linked to rising costs of clinical negligence cover. Walsall LMC medical secretary Dr Uzma Ahmad says the current levels of retirement are ‘just the tip of the iceberg’. 

Dr Ahmad says: ‘Last-man-standing practices and a lack of young GP partners in some practices mean GPs are prevented from taking retirement if they want to. If these issues are resolved, then we will see even higher numbers for GPs taking retirement.’

An NHS England spokesperson said ‘fewer GPs took voluntary early retirement last year than in 2013/14 or 2014/15’, but added that ‘it is clearly going to be harder to deal with workload by increasing the number of practising GPs if, despite more GP trainees, a higher number of older GPs decide to leave their practices’.

In 2016, NHS England revamped its ‘retainer’ scheme, designed to incentivise GPs to stay on in the profession. Under the revised scheme, GPs intending to take a break from general practice will be eligible for a bursary of up to £4,000 a year if they commit to four sessions a week – 12 times higher than the previous offer. But the latest data show that, as of September 2017, the scheme has only convinced 218 GPs (90 full-time equivalents) to stay on – not yet enough to balance out those retiring.

The Government now seems to be putting its faith in importing fully trained GPs from Europe, rather than trying to keep home-grown talent in place, with a target of recruiting 600 by April and 2,000-3,000 overall, although that first target is in doubt.

The BMA is working on potential solutions. Dr Brian Balmer, a former GPC negotiator and Essex LMCs chair, says that of local GPs retiring before 60 ‘every single one, no exceptions’ has blamed workload pressures and this is the ‘key issue’ the BMA is now working on, with a new plan expected to be released next month.

Dr Balmer says this BMA initiative will be one of the first to directly address the issue of GPs retiring early, but warns: ‘We haven’t really seen anything that has had an effect on those who have decided to retire early. The retention scheme was supposed to help but it really has had minimal effect.’

He insists the key to persuading GPs against taking early retirement is to take action early: ‘Once somebody’s made their mind up to go after a significant career, trying to dissuade them I think is a waste of time.’

Additional reporting by Emma Rosser

 

Rate this article  (4.53 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (17)

  • I am drawing my pension this August at 58. There is minimal financial hit. You get a 10% reduction in the amount you get but you get it for two extra years... to put it bluntly you are financially ahead of the game until you are 80. I will do a few OOH sessions now and again ( which in my area are indemnified so no need for MDU). Next Feb plan a belated gap year in Australia. Will be a person of independent means who can do what they like, assuming I dont die-- we are all on borrowed time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I blame Revalidation (lose your job if you dont comply ), a vicious and unrelenting GMC(damned if you ,damned if you don't) , CQC , stifling complaints culture , exorbitant indemnity as the factors leading to this , among others .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Excellent mark. and also the extra income can be put into an investment fund to then deliver an annuity to act as a top up if required to make up the shortfall.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • State Retirement Pension Payment - the absolute, most socking great Ponzi scheme ever foisted on a stupid public.

    Every school child should have this drummed into them

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Add Manslaughter to that list.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Also add the reducing pension allowance that the government reduced from £1.5milion to just over £1million meaning GPs hit the limits after which we get taxed heavily if you continue to add to your pension pot. Just waiting for the accountant to say take 24hr retirement

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Took Early Retirement

    I left at 57.5 for all the reasons stated. Now 61 and don't regret it for a moment.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GMC revalidation. Agree with all above comments. Glad I’m free of da GMC!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Revalidation and Appraisal is a significant obstacle for those who would have liked to continue part-time for a few years yet, and have retained a bit of self-respect despite everything.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • retired at 58 sold surgery for housing development NZ for a gap year did OOH /locums till 60 when no hit on pension excellent lump sum-really good financcial adviser then locums since then at 2 nice practices no problems with revalidation/reaccreditation will retire at 65--house improvments good holidays average 2-3 days a week when I wan t--whats the problem?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say