Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Bob Senior: The new contract provides some certainty but could give unwelcome results

The new contract gives GPs some much needed certainty on funding in tight financial times but the details require further examination, advises Bob Senior

My initial reaction, obviously we can’t put hard numbers on it, is that there’s one or two bits that are interesting but it does make me question how it is going to work.

For example the named GP for all patients sounds good in theory until you think we have an increasingly part-time profession, with a high proportion of salaried doctors who come and go. So a patient could surely have an accountable GP almost changing with the wind?

I think it’s a shame that they’ve only chosen to continue the unplanned admissions enhanced service for another year. Practices are putting a lot of time and resource into that, and there’s still uncertainty about whether they’ll pull the plug a year down the line.

They also said they were going to re-examine the Carr-Hill formula to make it ‘better reflect deprivation.’ The challenge with that is, what sort of area? How big a geographic location are they looking at?

Picking a city at random: Oxford, most people think it’s all Inspector Morse, gleaming towers and old jags, etc. But there are pockets in Oxford which have very high levels of deprivation, so if you look at it as a whole it could present a completely different picture to certain wards within that area.

So the simple statement ‘it will better reflect deprivation’ is a bit of a misnomer, we need to know how fair and accurate it will be in truth.

The money from PMS reviews being invested in primary medical services is good, because there was a lot of concern about the lack of clarity over that. So at least we have some certainty there – quite how it will be invested remains to be seen.

Guaranteeing maternity and paternity pay, again it provides certainty, and it’s a step in the right direction, even if the amounts they’re funding are perhaps not as adequate as they need to be. It’s certainly a lot less than it’s going to cost to back fill a locum in the modern climate - if you can find a locum that is.

And I think there are bits in the contract which are ill-conceived - in particular the bit about publishing GP income which could give some very unwelcome results.

Because there’s a very unequal market out there, and very little transparency about earnings. So you could now have a doctor in a difficult part of the country, on a salaried job, look at this and say “darling, where’s Wiltshire? Is it nice? Do they have good schools? Why am I working here for this, when I can go and work there for a lot more?”

I’ve said to the Government before, that they should be very careful with what they wish for because it might not give them what they expect.

Bob Senior is chair of the Association of Independent Specialist Medical Accountants and head of medical services at Baker Tilly.

Readers' comments (4)

  • How much does a magistrate earn. Is he better qualified?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does anybody know how you get to be a magistrate?
    I seriously quite fancy applying to be one - I've handed in my resignation as GP but in my 50's feel I've got lots more to contribute to society in that I can't play golf - and other than medicine haven't had time for any other hobbies, family life, holidays or much else over last 30 yrs.
    A magistrate - that sounds a neat job - how muchdo they get paid?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Magistrates get travel costs only haha!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interestingly not only do they not get paid, they are facing the same nonsense as all public servants in this country.
    Dumbing down, reduction in Admin support, court clerks leaving in droves, more work, more training, more oversight and scrutiny and major cutbacks. They even removed the free Hobnobs during coffee breaks for the magistrates in Nottingham magistrates court!
    Nigel- why not head to Aus for 5-10 years? work part time, do lots of travelling and leave this mess of a country behind. You will probably live longer and therefore draw your pension longer.
    Does anyone really think with 25 billion of austerity coming this way any deal for GP's is going to make life better.
    Just remember they have been analysing our tax returns and pension contributions for the past few years and have decided to completely FXXX us over.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say