Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

NAPC calls for Government rethink on PMS reviews

Exclusive GP leaders are warning that ‘thousands’ of GP jobs will be put at risk as a result of PMS reviews and are now calling for a Government rethink.

The National Association of Primary Care (NAPC) will be holding a summit on PMS in London 1 October to debate the funding issues faced by practices to encourage debate, it said.

NHS England has ordered area teams to review £260 million of PMS provision it said was not linked explicitly to extra patient services, but the NAPC warned that there were ‘significant problems’ with how they were being carried out.

Already, GP leaders have warned PMS practices are being left unsupported amid ‘illogical’ approaches to the review in parts of the country.

NAPC president Dr James Kingsland said: ‘The investment in PMS has supported the employment of salaried GPs and nurse practitioners in disadvantaged areas. These funding cuts will mean the loss of thousands of GP and nurse appointments, damaging patient care in areas that need it most.’

NAPC chair Dr Charles Alessi told Pulse that there were ‘significant problems’ with the way the review was being carried out.

He said: ‘The way this is being done is not particularly helpful. In many respects, even when you look at the increase in GMS baseline, we’re looking at an average loss of as much as £80,000 per practice, which is ineviably going to lead to some real problems with GMS.

‘We have been looking for reassurance from NHS England that the money will not be lost to primary care, but have heard nothing. This is a very serious issue and it needs to be managed, and it’s not being managed effectively by NHS England.’

Readers' comments (7)

  • please stop calling the NAPC 'GP leaders' They are the quislings who have the ear of the SS for health. The have no followers so cannot be called leaders

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agreed, they don't speak for me.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • PMS needs to end ASAP, maybe then we can focus are a fair approach to the GMS contract

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • its like arguing that the titanic needs a new coat of paint.

    all GPs i know are grafters i.e. they are hard workers and if made redundant or given their freedom i am sure they will adapt to new jobs but it will be interesting where NHSE are going to get the qualified and experienced 'gold' standard doctors that the public and they want (u know the 'right' kind of doctor that some NHS leader mentionned) ?

    it's no good wanting more coal from the coal mines and sacking the coal miners is it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NAPC has a better record of supporting DOH than the democratic arms of the profession. Nevertheless, go ahead and kick at the ankles of your masters.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NAPC has no democratic mandate,Charles' photo with the PM at the height of the Health Bill.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They certainly do not represent me or any other GP I know.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say