Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

NHS England sitting on hundreds of GP premises applications

Exclusive GP practices are paying double rent on buildings as a result of NHS England sitting on ‘several hundred’ long-standing applications from practices for their premises to be upgraded, NHS managers have claimed.

Speaking at the Commissioning Show conference in London on Thursday, an official from NHS England admitted there was a backlog of ‘several hundred’ applications for upgrades that had been made to PCTs before the NHS reforms in April 2013 while it continued its review on funding.

An audience member from a commissioning support unit said that there were practices in his region who were paying out double rent on old and new premises while they waited for their applications to be processed.

GP leaders said that there has been a ‘20-year freeze’ on premises developments, and said that there is no indication that any more cash is forthcoming.

It comes after one practice led by a prominent media medic has already said it may have to shut as a result of the funding squeeze, while the GPC has prioritised increasing premises funding in recent weeks.

Dawn Ginns, from NHS England’s Primary Care Commissioning, National Support Centre said that  NHS England had ‘honoured’ business cases  from practices who had already received PCT board level approval but that those at an earlier stage were still stuck and unable to make improvements.

Ms Ginn told the audience at the Commissioning Show: ‘I’m conscious and aware that, across the country, there are several hundred business cases actually that are outstanding, that need a decision to be made.’

‘We’ve been doing a lot of work with colleagues across the country to make sure they’ve got the right support to make decision around how we can prioritise those business cases, and what are the types of issues that we need to make sure we put the support in the right place.’

But Phillip Woolley, a manager at the North and East London CSU, said that the delays are leaving newly built premises unused at great expense.

He said: ‘I certainly know two GP practices whose buildings have been ready to go into, for nearly a year. So not only are they paying rent for their existing building, but they’re paying for the building they’re waiting to move in to.’

He said another GP had begun construction of new premises before any approval had been given ‘because he’d become so frustrated with NHS England, he just went ahead anyway.’

Responding, Ms Ginn said she couldn’t comment on specifics cases but added: ‘You’re absolutely right, there needs to be a process which is what we’ve been looking at. It is a risk for anyone to move out of a building, obviously, and start to build without approval.’

Ms Ginn told the audience at the Commissioning Show: ‘I’m conscious and aware that, across the country, there are several hundred business cases actually that are outstanding, that need a decision to be made.’

‘We’ve been doing a lot of work with colleagues across the country to make sure they’ve got the right support to make decision around how we can prioritise those business cases, and what are the types of issues that we need to make sure we put the support in the right place.’

She announced that NHS England would soon be launching an online toolkit to help practices to develop their business cases, and to help area teams prioritise them.

Speaking to Pulse, Ms Ginn explained that the tool kit was one way to help shift the backlog and that a national strategy was under development.

She told Pulse: ‘We’re working on a big national premises strategy with our colleagues. But we haven’t got that together as yet, so it’s trying to give area teams some sort of principles and guidance to prioritise those business cases.’

‘They’re all at various stages – some have just given a quick expression of interest – but what we’ve said as part of the policy, is that the risk is with the practice until that decision has been made at area team level, and that will be funded and supported.’

Dr Peter Holden, a GPC negotiator, said that there was no indication that income was forthcoming.

He said: ‘There’s basically been a 20-year freeze on a decent number of developments. The Government says it has no cash, but when is it going to have some cash? Because you can’t have the shift in emphasis away from hospital-based care to general practice-based care, without some investment in premises.’

The GPC this month launched a major policy drive to improve the ‘live issue’ of GP premises, collecting examples of poor investment across the country, which it will present to ministers.

Readers' comments (4)

  • One debacle after another and yet still they are asking us to do more for less and work out of buildings that can take no more. When will they realise unfortunatley the public will end up with what they pay for which will be less not more.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just Your Average Joe

    There is money in the system but it is being sucked out by the Private sector from PFI white elephant builds.

    The Politicians need to wake up and realise they are being bled dry by their private pals.

    There should be a moratorium on payments - so once the PFI company has made back their investment they should now be cut off, so that money can be reinvested into premises for Primary care.

    For those people who say what about the contracts - well we as GPs hold contracts which aren't worth the paper the are written on - and are aware of the DOH ability to unilateral impose renegotiated contracts.

    Or are they powerless to do this for fear of loosing the money being paid into their re-election funds? Or just worried they will be taken to court?

    Billions are being wasted and could provide the money for ALL premises to be upgraded and extended to bring new work From secondary care, and extra capacity for training in Primary Care.

    BMA you have your agenda marked out for a real change for Primary care you can be proud of, if you use your influence to actually make a difference.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You are right PFI are getting 20% returns when savers get 2 no wonder it is great to build surgeries with 25 year leases

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • My 3 year rent review was overdue in June last year. I have sent in 3 PREM forms to the PCA and finally after bullying and harrasment charges were voiced, the LMC, KPCA and NHS England had a meeting. I was adivsed to put a fourth PREM and when I protested as all data had been provided earlier, a DV was sent over in the first week of MAY. It is july and though DV report is available, the NHS Trust has declined to give me a copy as it was paid by NHS. At the last review, this copy was sent to me without asking. So much for transparency. A Practice next door has rent of 83000 per year while we are paid 29000 and have been refused rent for two rooms - One is the PMs office which also houses the Server and the other is a meeting room in which the PCT people themselves have attended multiple meetings. We had been asked in an email to provide details of usage of these two rooms. When we provided these, a demand was raised to show the usage of every single room and I have now been asked to document every entrance to one room and how many minutes were spent there by which staff member at what time - a log for 2 months !!
    There is corruption in the system and the need for transparency how NHS Trusts deal with Practices.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say