Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Fears for QOF funding as NHS draws up contingency plans to pay GPs from next month

Exclusive NHS bosses have been forced to draw up emergency plans to ensure GP practices will be paid for QOF work from next month, with a final decision on whether to deploy the new system designed to calculate practices’ achievement not due to be taken until the end of March, Pulse can reveal.

‘Contingency options’ have been drawn up by NHS England and the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) in order to pay practices for their estimated QOF performance in 2014/15 from April if it is not possible to do so through the new Calculating Quality Reporting Service (CQRS) system.

Managers are also discussing ‘a number of options’ to ensure that QOF achievement payments for 2013/14 are paid from June in the event that practice QOF data is not available via the General Practice Extraction Service.

But GP leaders have warned that any contingency plan must not pile additional workload on practices or delay payments, amid fears that QOF funding could be disrupted.

Minutes from the HSCIC published in February reveal there have been ‘some technical issues’ with the implementation of the GP Extraction Service, which is ‘on the critical path for QOF and care.data extracts’, but say that the situation is ‘improving’ and ‘mitigation’ is in place.

The GPES and CQRS systems were supposed to save GP practices time by automating the recording and approval of DES, QOF and vaccination payments. But GPES and CQRS have been plagued with technical problems, with GPs forced to take on the time-consuming task of manually inputting data and hundreds of practices facing frustration when their passwords to the reporting system expired without warning.

HSCIC has repeatedly assured practices that the technical problems would be remedied in time for the end-of-year QOF extractions next month, but in its latest statement revealed that contingency plans are being put in place, with practices only due to be informed at the end of March if they will be implemented to ensure practices are paid for the QOF.

An HSCIC spokesperson was unable to say what the contingency plans were, or what additional work they could involve for GPs, but said that they would mitgate any ‘unforeseen issues’ with the new system.

She said: ‘Protecting achievement and aspiration payments is our main priority in the event that QOF data is not available via GPES for all GP practices by the end of March.’

‘With this in mind, NHS England and HSCIC have developed a contingency option that will ensure an estimated QOF 2014/15 aspiration payment will be made to GP practices through CQRS in April as normal.’

‘For QOF 2013/14 achievement, a number of options are being discussed to ensure the payments are made within expected business timelines. More information will be available shortly on how this will be achieved.’

She added: ‘It is normal when implementing a new system to plan contingency options in case of unforseen issues; however the contingency plan has not been invoked as yet. HSCIC will determine at the end of March if the contingency will be implemented to ensure that GP practices receive their QOF 2014/15 aspiration payment in April.’

But Dr Grant Ingrams, a GP in Coventry and former chair of the GPC IT subcommittee, warned the uncertainty was causing alarm among GPs, with QOF accounting for a significant proportion of practice income and other payment issues resulting from the handover to NHS England from PCTs still not fully resolved.

He told Pulse: ‘They’ve had several years to sort this out, and it’s a bit of a mess that with a few weeks to go we’re still waiting to hear definitively whether CQRS is going to work or not.’

‘I would hope that any contingency plan did not require any unresourced work on the part of practices, and would not result in any delay in payment causing further financial hardship to practices that are already having huge problems with financial cash flow.’

Dr Gavin Jamie, a GP in Swindon who runs the QOF database website, said GPs needed more clarity on what the contingencies might involve.

He said: ‘I doubt any contingency plan is going to be any easier than the CQRS plan - it’s almost certainly more work. It’s going to be more people-intensive to do.’

Readers' comments (7)

  • Vinci Ho

    Most people in the public probably have not heard of or even believed that a GP surgery can just close because the government did not pay enough.
    Together with further funding cut like taking the MPIG , less money per head in PMS, people may see a 'new reality' .You wonder whether this is even premeditated ?
    Well done , agent Hunt . Also congratulate , you have now extra ammunition to shut down hospital whenever you like without the worry of 'breaking the law'......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes - it is incredible how ludicrous all this is. MPs have just voted to allow themselves to close any well-performing and financially viable hospital in 40 days, simply if its neighbour is underperforming.

    Imagine if it was your GP surgery, closed because the next-door practice was badly run.

    Why is there no outcry from our leaders on these issues?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's worth reading the minutes - if only as an example of how to publish minutes without allowing any meaningful information to be displayed!
    The problems with GPES are noted - but no action follows.
    care.data mentioned.
    References to papers: no links and not clear whether the papers are available.
    Is it worth following up on the NAO letter which produced an extrordinary Board meeting?
    You'll be glad to hear that HSCIC has no problems with the end of support for XP in April: the Board recognises that many Trusts do: and general practice and Community Care don't even get a mention!

    I get the impression that 'transparency' and 'accountability' only apply to the plebs and not to the ALBs created by the HSCA....

    Just asking: would you be prepared to fund a chip-shop run by HSCIC?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I see no real reason for NHSE to want us to work in mega practices. Patients like a personal service which is easier in a smaller practice. Politically most patients would not support a new organisation closing down their existing practice, so a political hot potato. They will lose negotiating power. Practices will be able to say "no" and no local competitor will be able to fill the void.
    Large practices do not necessarily make for efficiency: otherwise hospitals would be the most economical place for patients to be looked after: we could then stop saying don't come to A&E, but encourage it!!!
    Like many committed doctors- I have always wanted to be a doctor since age 6- all the bad news and increasing demands makes me increasingly interested in retirement, when I should be passing on my enthusiasm and skills.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Everyone needs to finally take their head out of the clouds and wake up and smell the coffee. There is not enough money in the system!!!!! Patients need to pay a supplement towards their care in addition to their taxes and we need to train more GP's....if the government can manage to attract them to this miserable existence...but as ever, year on year it's this endless exercise in futility. When will it ever end? Not with this government...and I fear not the next....or ever

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr Mustapha Tahir

    The BMA should mount a massive public awareness campaign on the non-stop assault on the NHS and GPs by this Government.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Mustapha Tahir
    What - after it has already meekly accepted the reforms that have led us here? What is it supposed to say:- GPs are neither able nor worthy of leading the NHS? And that this government were wrong to let them? The government has paid it's peices of silver - they aren't going to give any more!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say