Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GMC 'pleased with revalidation progress' despite deferrals for one in 10 GPs

The GMC has declared it is ‘pleased with progress’ after the first year of revalidation, despite more than one in 10 GPs having their revalidation deferred.

Figures released today by the regulator show that some 10,288 GPs have been revalidated in the first year of the scheme, while 1,171 GPs have had their revalidation deferred.

Responsible officers can recommend that a GP’s revalidation should be deferred if they cannot make a decision about the doctor’s revalidation on the basis of the information currently available to them. This could be because the doctor has provided incomplete supporting information, or because they are going through a local investigation or disciplinary process and the result will inform the responsible officer’s decision. Doctors can also request a deferral if they are on a career break or parental leave. Revalidation can be deferred for up to a year after the doctor’s original revalidation date.

The figures come days after a long-serving GPC negotiator launched a furious attack on revalidation, claiming GPs were routinely spending more than 40 hours preparing for appraisals and calling on the BMA to reconsider its support for the process.

However the GMC said the number of deferrals was ‘expected’ and instead opted highlighted the number of successful revalidations, which it said represented good progress on its target to revalidate one-fifth of all doctors by April 2014.

GMC chief executive Niall Dickson said: ‘These are very early days but we are pleased with the progress made in the first year. This new system of checks is a world first and over time we believe it will make a significant contribution towards making sure patients in the UK receive safe, effective care.’

‘Already we see signs that it is making an impact with hospitals and other healthcare organisations recognising their responsibility, not only to make sure all their doctors have the attitude and skills to deliver high quality care, but also that they have the support and information they need to assess and reflect on their practice.’

‘There is more to do but this is about supporting doctors to provide the best possible care and making sure patients can have confidence in the care their doctors provide. We will develop the model, and we will listen and learn from the experience of those who use it as we do so. But this is a good start.’

The first six months saw the GMC focus on responsible officers and ‘GP leaders’, while revalidation of other GPs kicked off in earnest from April this year.

Dr Clare Gerada RCGP Chair August 2011 online

 

Don’t miss the LIVE Q&A with former RCGP chair Clare Gerada tomorrow

Post your burning questions here and log on tomorrow to speak to Professor Gerada

Readers' comments (6)

  • 4 words...

    complete waste of time

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 3 more words

    ... tick box exercise...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think it all depends on using the right tools in preparing for your appraisal. Ever since our ccg has moved to using www.gptools.org, not only have they saved over £100K+ but the time we spend in recording evidence and reflecting upon it has been drastically cut. I recently completed my patient feedback using their service, just downloaded and printed out the forms - got the report back in less than two days. Use a toolkit which embraces new technology to make your life easier.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am all for making my life easier when engaging with meaningful exercises. Revalidation to me is a meaningless exercise, therefore any time I spend on revalidation, is time poorly spent, in my opinion. I would rather spend it on patient care.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's very difficult to find a single colleague or anyone on a forum who supports revalidation. The only people who say it is a good idea seem to have deeply vested interests whilst hiding behind the mantra of patient safety. I'd say the opposite is in fact true and it's all about power and control whilst sadly diverting precious resources away from patient care. Given that we have been forced to do this for free, I question the legality of it and wonder whether the law may have been broken? This is a deeply unpopular reform at a difficult time for the NHS. It's time those those who are wielding the power here are brought to account.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • revalidation makes doctors feel like subservient children. What was once a 'profession' has been destroyed by revalidation, GMC, BMA, CQC...

    We should all mourn the day this happened and we just bent over to accept our punishment...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say