Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Locum dilemma: Do I have to sign these prescriptions?

Two experts advise a locum GP unsure of whether to sign prescriptions

I can see that this practice rarely reviews its methadone prescriptions, and the practice manager has just threatened to refer me to the GMC if I don’t sign 30 of these prescriptions before I head off to my next practice this afternoon. What should I do?

Dr Justine Hall

Dr Justine Hall: Only prescribe within your competence

A doctor must work within the limits of their competence and must only prescribe drugs or treatments where there is adequate knowledge of the patient’s health, as stated in the GMC’s document ‘Good practice in prescribing and managing medicines and devices’. You must keep your skills up to date therefore unless you had recent training or experience in substance misuse it is unlikely you would feel confident in this subject and I would advise refusing to sign the prescriptions. The RCGP's ‘Guidance for the use of substitute prescribing in the treatment of opioid dependence in primary care’ might help.

The person who signs the prescription is the one who would be held accountable if something goes wrong. You also need to check dosage, contraindications, consent and ensure appropriate follow up as well as good record keeping, as emphasised in MPS', ‘Safe Prescribing'. It is unlikely in this context you could do all these things so it is probably best not to sign them.

Liaising with another GP in the same practice or a practice pharmacist may provide enough information for you to be able to feel confident in signing such prescriptions however the onus is on you to ensure you meet GMC guidelines so if you have doubts, do not sign. As long as you stick to GMC guidelines you have nothing to fear if the practice did report you to the GMC. You have done nothing to breach GMC guidelines by refusing to sign.

The GMC also states where you have concerns you should question any action you consider to be unsafe. The practice should respond constructively to any concerns raised about their own practice. There are various policies both local and nationally on whistleblowing in the NHS but I would seek advice from your indemnity provider and/or the BMA if a member before doing so.

In many areas there are dedicated substance misuse centres where methadone prescriptions are provided and administered. It is worth asking for advice from the CCG and LMC here especially if you have concerns about the safety of prescribing within the practice.

Lastly it is important to never be bullied in the workplace and the BMA has recently published a document to help doctors in this situation.

Dr Justine Hall is a GP in Guildford and planned care clinical lead at Guildford and Waverley CCG

Dr Ed Farnan

Dr Edward Farnan: Balance the risks of signing and not signing

Although the prescriptions may have been authorised by the patients’ regular GP and printed off by a receptionist for signing, you are responsible for the prescriptions you sign.

The GMC says you must recognise and work within the limits of your own competence. If you don’t feel competent to sign a prescription for methadone, for example because you have no experience with this particular medication or feel you need to know more about the patient’s medical history before doing so, you should explain the reasons for this to the practice manager. Even though it may be a difficult conversation to have with the practice manager, you need to ensure that the prescriptions are safe.

When issuing repeat prescriptions, you need to determine in each case, whether you can safely prescribe the medication, including whether you have adequate knowledge of the patient’s health and are satisfied the drug serves the patient’s needs.

You will need to balance the risks and benefits of signing the prescription against the risks of not doing so – are patients more likely to come to harm in the short term by continuing medication without an appropriate review, or by having such medication declined thereby running the possible risk of withdrawal symptoms pending an appropriate review? Document carefully what you have done and explain why.

If you decide that you cannot sign all or some of the prescriptions, you may want to check if another doctor in the practice who is more familiar with the patients or with methadone prescribing is willing to do so. If not, there may need to be alternative arrangements put in place in the short term to ensure that patients are not disadvantaged.

If you have concerns about the practice’s policies or procedures then you should raise these within the practice, initially, and externally if you are not satisfied that appropriate action has been taken. Keep a careful record of this for future reference.

Dr Edward Farnan is a medicolegal advisor at the Medical Defence Union

Read more in Pulse's locum guide

Rate this article  (5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (3)

  • I am not sure this is a conversation relevant to have with the practice manager. I would seek to document a discussion with one of the Partners in which it is confirmed that they have adequate procedures in place to monitor and review these prescriptions, and that they are pre-authorised as safe. Then your documentation would show, in the case of any untoward incident, that you had exercised due diligence in checking the appropriatenes and safety before signing them.
    Occasionally we pick up bizarre instructions on scripts (eg predictive text dose abbreviation expansion) which is not evident on-screen, or a clear concern about reliability of pick-up frequency, and in such circumstances there may be need to review patient or correct and re-print; but if you do not have time, it needs to be 'overtime' or 'hand-over' time!
    If a GP is not available, maybe they should be left with a promise to phone them later for the discussion:- these scripts should have a 48 hour window at the very least for issue, preferably 3 working days - in case of issues of course!
    If there are serious concerns about the practice' procedures, these should be discussed with a mentor, colleague, or LMC Rep. promptly.
    Methadone prescribing shuld be overseen by a doctor with relevant experience and training/qualificiations, and if they are not available, the service should be reconsidered. Obviously a qualified 'specialist' locum would be required if the named doctor is on leave.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If these prescriptions are on blue prescriptions -they really need to be signed by doctors who have the relevant training and experience. Remember patients can die from respiratory depression without due diligence. If employed as a 'regular' Gp Locum without expertise I feel you shouldn't sign and potentially expose yourself.

    The practice ( and manager ) should have ensured post dated prescriptions to cover the period when the normal prescriber was away to ensure continuation of supply so patients didn't suffer -,failure to do so is not a Locum's problem and undue inappropriate pressure should be reported to the lmc and ccg - I guess they are claiming additional funds for providing this service ( and are stupid if not) - if they are not organised enough to cover holidays etc then it's their lookout - if they need a drug misuse Gp to sign then let them organise it - do NOT be pressurised to prescribe. The practice manager is out of order but let down by her regular gp's.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Blimey that's awful. Where is this place (so I can avoid locuming here)?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say