This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Quarter of QOF indicators to be scrapped under new proposals

A quarter of QOF indicators could be cut under new proposals drawn up following a review of the framework.

The indicators that are to scrapped will be discussed following an ‘engagement exercise’ with GPs and other stakeholders, launching today.

The consultation comes after a review of the framework involving representatives from the BMA’s GP Committee, RCGP, NICE, Public Health England, Department of Health and NHS England.

Proposals for a reformed QOF come despite the head of NHS England, Simon Stevens, saying that QOF needed to be done away with entirely.

Despite fewer indicators, NHS England said the proportion of practice income that QOF contributes will remain the same.

Instead, practices will be able to choose from a list of ‘quality improvement’ options that will be agreed nationally and locally.

The RCGP told Pulse in May that GPs would be able to choose from a ‘menu’ of other services - such as for example obesity services - for which they would get paid.

The proposals also suggest that between a third and a half of the indicators will be updated to reflect NICE guidance.

The report also suggests a more personalised approach to ‘exception reporting’, which will allow GPs to make a clinical judgement over whether a patient needs to - for example – have their blood pressure checked if other attributes of the patient suggest otherwise.

Meanwhile, the report also proposes meeting QOF targets as a network of practices, which NHS England has said will be trialled first.

NHS England told Pulse the purpose of the QOF changes are to recognise the pressure practices are under, to create stability for general practice and so GPs aren’t over burdened by what they need to do in relation to the scheme.

Following the engagement exercise, which is open to all GPs from today until the end of August, the feedback will be discussed with the GPC during the contract negotiations for next year. 

NHS England said the earliest changes to the QOF will be implemented is April 2019, when the new contract comes into effect.

However, it added that some changes may take an extra year to put in place.

Ian Dodge, NHS England’s national director for strategy and innovation said: ‘2019 starts the most substantial discussion of the GP contract since 2004 - given the forthcoming long term NHS plan, current pressures on general practice, the emergence of primary care networks, QOF and indemnity reform, the partnership and premises reviews.

'This calls for more intensive joint working between NHS England and our partners, particularly the BMA, and I look forward to constructive and fruitful discussions with Richard and his team.’ 

BMA GPC chair Dr Richard Vautrey said: ‘In the year the health service turns 70, we need to take serious steps to address the fundamental issues facing general practice, from workload and workforce pressures to unsustainable indemnity costs and problems with premises.

‘NHS England’s commitment to work with us to address these and other issues which we have repeatedly highlighted is welcome.

‘We have been pleased to work with NHS England and other partners, to review QOF and produce a report that will stimulate further discussion, given the BMA has been calling for a review of QOF that both provides stability for practices and better enables them to respond to the needs of their patients.’

Readers' comments (9)

  • I seem to recall talk of an additional rise in income to be announced in August. This was the sugar to sweeten the bitter message that we would receive a 1% uplift in April whilst everyone else in the NHS was getting better deals. Any news on this??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Banner

    Easy QOF points go, difficult ones remain, if you want to recoup the drop in income choose an Enhanced Service involving far more useless work.
    The worst of both worlds.
    (As usual)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Same old collection of commissars killing off the keystone of the NHS primary care.FFS we are well and truly screwed by the 1-3 session prawn sandwich and power point brigade.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • More cost cutting but we’re expected to do the work of the indicators for nothing to prove we are maintaining good standards of care. And I don’t believe NHS England that income won’t be affected as there’s always something hidden in the small print. Not only are we up the creek without a paddle but without a boat either. I feel myself going down for the third time!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Knowledge is Porridge

    Please just try stopping QOF.
    I propose Devon to pilot this change.
    The report seems to have summarised how useless it is, then decided to carry on??
    Must have had a different subcommittee to produce the different sections.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ID10Ts - take away QOF money - we will still have to do the work to keep CQC : and our negotiators our bound to agree to twice as much additional work to get the income back.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Knowledge is Porridge

    If workforce crisis is the number 1 issue (all agreed?) then stop QOF and leave the money in Partnerships.
    Reasons to be a locum or go overseas: "I dont have to worry about QOF" is very high on the list.
    Sort out litigation, appraisal, CQC and referrals management too. Suddenly GP partner looks like a great job again.
    Will care standards fall without the yearly tick box stuff? Of course not, especially when the focus is on the outcomes rather than metrics.
    I think the benefits of continuity from same GP (in partnership with long term commitment to the practice) is the most cost effective thing we do.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    And who’s the biggest ‘stakeholder’ in the decision making process? Certainly not primary care that’s for sure. It’s all about primary care funding and yet we are a minority stakeholder. In my small minded, ill informed, completly irrelevant, ‘15 years experience as just another crap GP’ opinion I can confidently predict that if QOF is reduced by 1/4 most of the funding will disappear to be replaced by a different set of hoops that are just that little bit more difficult to achieve. The end result? The biggest stakeholder wins, and funding to primary care is cut.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • to be honest, why should the GPs be paid for maintaining a disease register? makes no sense -it is a requirement
    the lower achievement target should be abolished and only the upper target should be paid and then we will see the global improvement in LTC care

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say