Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

First GP is at risk of losing licence to practise through revalidation

Exclusive A first GP is at risk of losing their licence to practise for failing to engage with revalidation, the GMC has told Pulse, as official figures show one in ten GPs have had their revalidation date postponed.

The regulator said that five doctors overall, including the one GP, failed to engage with the revalidation process, and have been notified they are at risk of losing their licence. The GMC said it was unable to provide details about how the doctors failed to engage.

The GMC has also told Pulse that it recommended deferral for 754 of the 7,628 GPs (10%) appraised between 3 December 2012 and 28 August 2013, compared with 15% of all doctors.

A GMC protocol for responsible officers instructs them to make a recommendation that a doctor has failed to engage with revalidation if the doctor has not taken part in appraisal or other revalidation activities, and all reasonable local processes have been exhausted in attempts to rectify the doctor’s failure to engage.

It adds that if the GMC decides to begin the process of administratively removing a doctor’s licence to practise, they are informed and given 28 days to make representations to the GMC if they wish to appeal.

Doctors leaders called on the GMC to release details of why doctors had failed to engage with revalidation.

Dr Jane Lothian, chair of Northumberland LMC, said: ‘I’m in two minds. I’ve been through the process, and I was very apprehensive, but all I did was tick all the boxes I had to and I got my letter saying I’d been revalidated. It wasn’t as bad as I’d thought.

‘What I really think is important now is for us to find out all the details of why doctors were deferred, or failed to engage. Is it people who are failing on minor technicalities? They’ve got to tell us, so that LMCs can do their job and support doctors, that’s what we’re here for.’

The GMC also revealed that the total number of doctors whose revalidation date has been deferred has also shot up. In June, Pulse reported that 10% of the 8,724 doctors appraised between December 2012 and June 2013 had their revalidation deferred, including 351 GPs.

The latest figures show that the total number of doctors whose revalidation date has been deferred has shot up to 15%, while the number of GPs who have had their revalidation deferred is now 754 - 10% of the 7,628 GPs in total.

The regulator said that doctors in training make up almost half of all deferral recommendations as their revalidation date is postponed to coincide with the date of their Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT).

A GMC spokesperson said: ‘When revalidation was introduced doctors in training had their first revalidation date set at their projected Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT) date. Since the start of revalidation many of these dates have changed, as expected, and their responsible officer has deferred them to the new anticipated date. Doctors in training represent 47% of the current deferrals of all doctors.’

GMC chief executive Mr Niall Dickson said added that it was is expected that revalidation will be deferred for a ‘small proportion’ of doctors.

He said: ‘We have now seen more than 16,500 doctors revalidated and every doctor in the UK with a licence to practise should now have a revalidation date. The system is up and running and the reports we are receiving indicate that it is working well at local level.

‘The vast majority of doctors put forward have successfully revalidated and, as expected, we have approved a small proportion for deferral. This usually means a six month delay or less.

‘The system is meant to be flexible so that if responsible officers need more time before making a recommendation they can apply to us for a deferral which enables the doctor to continue to practise in the meantime.’

The news comes as GPC leaders say they will still support the revalidation process, even amid concerns that NHS England might withdraw funding for remediation.

Readers' comments (16)

  • This urgently needs to be taken to judicial review. To block experienced doctors from practicing after years of safe service can't be legal. Those responsible for revalidation should face some sort of sanction ASAP as shifting such limited resources to such unscientific, unproven bureaucratic nonsense is clearly damaging to patients and brings the medical profession into disrepute.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Alot of these doctors will be close to retirement anyway.I don't understand why they put up with all this crap.Just take the pension and go.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Revalidation is there for only one purpose. Patient safety. I rather like the Anonymous 02 September 2013 10:58pm suggestion. A fair number of high quality graduates are waiting (probably stacking shelves or heaving stuff around in garden centres) ready to engage in the process.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 11.24pm Revalidation adds nothing to patient safety, quite the opposite in fact. By placing an additional burden on GPs, productivity is reduced and the NHS becomes more dangerous due to the drag on scarce resources.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If it was a case of protecting patients from incompetent doctors then a rigourous knowledged based exam with an emphasis on clinical skills would fit the bill . What we have in revalidation is a political solution to a " something must be done " response to the Shipman murders. Itis a cumbersome ,bureaucratic exercise with little relevance to medical practice and most likely window dressing instead of a proper assessment.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 8.41 "a rigourous knowledged based exam with an emphasis on clinical skills would fit the bill"
    Heard of MRCGP, MRCP or MRCS?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I love this comment:
    Dr Jane Lothian, chair of Northumberland LMC, said: ‘I’m in two minds. I’ve been through the process, and I was very apprehensive, but all I did was tick all the boxes I had to and I got my letter saying I’d been revalidated'

    ie - what on earth is the point!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been deleted by the moderator

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • MRCGP every five years would be perfect instead of revalidation .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just emigrate. The political class in the UK has successfully destroyed the medical profession. Shame on those in our profession who have facilitated this distruction. It will get worse year on year. Leave now.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say