ICBs urged to consider decommissioning services from GP practices
ICBs have been urged to take a ‘bold’ approach to planning services, including decommissioning services from GP practices and looking ‘beyond traditional healthcare providers’.
These considerations will form part of five-year planning strategies every ICB must produce by January next year and update annually, according to a new NHS England strategic commissioning framework.
ICBs will also continue to be responsible for the performance of primary care providers, the framework document stated.
Earlier this year, an NHS England draft ‘model ICB blueprint’ outlined areas which could be transferred to new ‘neighbourhood teams’ in order to help ICBs achieve a 50% reduction in running costs.
NHS England defines ‘strategic’ commissioning as planning for services ‘over the longer term’ to ‘improve population health, reduce health inequalities and improve equitable access to consistently high-quality healthcare’.
The framework said: ‘ICBs, to varying degrees of success, have been carrying out the four stages of strategic commissioning but now is the time for a more comprehensive and consistent approach across all ICBs.
‘This requires commissioners to be bold and rearrange and, potentially, decommission services to secure the best possible health outcomes, quality of services and value for the taxpayer, while ensuring they continue to reduce healthcare inequalities.’
ICBs will ‘continue to be accountable’ for the performance of primary care providers and national contract requirements such as for primary care, the framework said, while ‘regional NHS teams’ will take a lead on overall provider trust performance from April next year.
The document also suggested strategic commissioners should ‘look beyond traditional healthcare providers’ by considering ‘community assets’ as part of neighbourhood health service planning.
It added: ‘As part of a forthcoming strategic commissioning development programme, NHS England will support ICB commissioners of GP services to create the right conditions for improving general practice, including with nationally delivered tools and programmes that can enable ICBs to develop their capabilities.’
Elsewhere in the framework, NHS England reiterated the central role of the NHS federated data platform (FDP) in aiding commissioning decisions.
The FDP, intended to link data from across NHS organisations to support both planning and direct care, began rolling out in NHS trusts last year.
Palantir – a US tech firm known for its work with US intelligence and security agencies – was awarded a £330m, seven-year contract in 2023 to deliver the FDP.
‘ICBs should use the capabilities that will be provided through the NHS FDP to support segmentation, risk stratification and predictive modelling and work with the NHS FDP team to develop this offer further,’ the framework said.
Integrating data with the FDP need to be preceded by establishing ‘necessary data sharing agreements across partners’ as well as ‘information governance to allow for re-identification of at-risk cohorts within clinical settings’.
NHS England said a model ‘digital blueprint’, which will be published in 2026/27, will guide ICBs on connecting to the FDP, as well as the NHS app and from 2028 the single patient record.
Last month, NHS England announced an aim to set GPs a new target of seeing 90% of all ‘clinically urgent’ patients on the same day. A medium-term planning document published sets as one of its targets to ‘improve access to primary care, including reducing unwarranted variation in access’.
Pulse has investigated how local enhanced service funding varies widely across different commissioning areas in England.
ICB deadlines
January 2026: set out a five-year strategy;
January 2026: a five-year health improvement plan to support the delivery of the strategy;
February 2026: baseline assessment of themselves against the strategic commissioning framework;
March 2026: integrated needs assessment setting out a ‘detailed understanding of the population served’ to be updated annually;
March 2027: establish a new intelligence function, incorporating the NHS FDP.
Related Articles
READERS' COMMENTS [4]
Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles


Our ICB ‘boldly’ decommissioned long running community consultant run gynae and urology services running at tarrif costs from a decade ago …
Decommission from the effective part and recommission with the completely untested hospital run part with its sublime track record of efficiency and cost effectiveness. What could possibly go wrong 🤔
I’m not aware locally of any significant experience in commissioning on this scale. Currently they don’t even appear to be able to enforce contractual arrangements with local providers who fail on a fairly regular basis to deliver on aspects of their contracts.
Meanwhile NHSE appear to have similar significant limitations in their abilty to deliver reform in secondary care, never mind primary care, spending increasing billions on a failing service which needs root and branch reform but is deeply resistant to any change. Their failure to “improve” primary care is due in large part to the systematic defunding of General Practice and attempts to micromanage something they don’t understand, and then blaming it for the failings of the overall system. Their most recent innovation, the econsult, has been a big success, aimed at improving patient access, it appears to have caused the loss of around 200k appointments a week according to a recent estimate. Even if it’s half that, it’s catastrophic. The track record of NHSE is one of abject failure (remember how much it cost the tax payer when they took over out of hours provision?). They can certainly “talk the talk” as so many Health Secretaries have found to their cost. “Walking the walk” requires an entirely different skill set, something which is, even to the most simple examination, plainly not there.
Which leads to the main point, where is the scrutiny and oversight of these organisations, where is the rigorous analysis of their ability to effect change and manage that. It’s supposed to be through Parliament, but they’ve effectively managed to sideline the role of the House of Commons and avoid any democratic scrutiny or accountability to the public as a result (2012 Health and Sociaal Care Act).
I cannot understand why the government is set upon destroying the NHS. Its clear we need more doctors, not data platforms. Why dont they get it? Is it the powerful industry lobbies or the sheer lack of understanding on the part of the ministers?