This site is intended for health professionals only

‘No tangible benefits’ seen from scrapping CCGs in favour of ICSs, warns Government watchdog

‘No tangible benefits’ seen from scrapping CCGs in favour of ICSs, warns Government watchdog

The latest NHS commissioning overhaul, which scrapped CCGs and introduced integrated care systems (ICSs) has not shown any ‘tangible benefits’ to patients, according to an influential group of MPs.

A report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), published today, also warned the Government to urgently publish the much-delayed comprehensive NHS workforce plan.

ICSs are undermined by the Government’s ‘lack of leadership’ and ‘failure’ to tackle major systemic issues facing the NHS, including its critical workforce shortages, elective backlogs, and the NHS’ relationship with social care, the MPs warned.

All 42 ICSs became statutory bodies in July 2022, taking over the commissioning responsibilities previously held by the now defunct clinical commissioning groups (CCGs).

The Committee also claimed the ‘integrated’ element of ICSs appears ‘underdeveloped’, marked by a ‘concerning lack of oversight’.

The PAC said it was concerned these reforms will be a ‘missed opportunity’ if guidance is not published to set out how the NHS and local government can work together.

It pointed in particular to the lack of leadership from the DHSC on the expected relationship between health and social care, and the lack of clarity as to who will intervene if joint working between the NHS and other partners breaks down.

MPs also suggested it is ‘unclear’ what ‘tangible benefits patients will see from the move to ICSs’, flagging that the timescales for improvements – which range from three to 10 years – are ‘worryingly long’.

This is worsened by both the DHSC and NHS England neglecting to set out what specific benefits they expect from ICSs, or by when, the Committee said.

They said: ‘We are concerned ICSs may struggle to make progress on their longer-term aims to prevent ill-health, given pressure for progress on immediate national priorities, for example, the need to reduce elective care backlogs and bring down A&E and ambulance waiting times.’

The PAC also called on the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) to publish its comprehensive workforce plan, the absence of which has placed ‘significant restraints’ on ICS’ ability to deliver on their core aims.

The report said: ‘The Department has repeatedly failed to make good on its commitments to produce a plan to address this issue, and now many areas of the NHS workforce appear to be in crisis.’

The workforce plan was first committed in the January 2019 NHS Long Term Plan, set to be implemented by 2019’s end. This was delayed until December 2020, before eventually being commissioned in July 2021, with a view of publishing it by Christmas 2022.

The DHSC had also declined to commit to the PAC’s request to publish the plan by April 2023.

NHS England’s board meeting heard last week that the workforce plan was ‘in the very final stages of development’. NHS England has also begun working on a primary care recovery strategy.

The PAC report further urged the Government to publish its capital strategy in early 2023 followed by annual progress updates, claiming the DHSC seems ‘unable to make timely decisions to address’ the worsening estates issue.

The cost of tackling outstanding maintenance work on the NHS estate has grown from £5bn to £9bn over the last seven years.

PAC chair Dame Meg Hillier said: ‘Far from improving the health of the nation, staff shortages and the dire condition of the NHS estate pose a constant risk to patient safety. But Government seems paralysed, repeatedly rethinking and delaying crucial interventions and instead coming up with plans that do nothing to address the fundamental problems of funding and accountability.

‘The ICS reforms have potential but there is no clear responsibility for ensuring that social care is properly integrated with health care or that patients will see the difference on the ground. Changes will not succeed if they are imposed on the NHS in its current state. Government needs to get a grip on the wider, full-blown health and social care crisis it allowed to develop from long before the pandemic.’

Last week, a Pulse investigation revealed that at least £64.6m of funding available under the additional roles reimbursement scheme (ARRS) this year is currently forecast to go unspent, with ICBs expected to reallocate just 13% of it.


Pulse Practice Jobs Logo

Are you looking for a new GP role?

Pulse Practice Jobs has 100s of GP vacancies to help power your next career move.

View and apply online ►


Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles

Mr Marvellous 8 February, 2023 9:25 am


Abolsutely no-one predicted this.

Dr Anonymous 8 February, 2023 10:31 am

Nobody could have predicted this, surely!

Rushed through and poor legislation.
Poor transition with no shadow year.
Gov’t desperate to get rid of CCGs (and clinical leadership at the core of local NHS planning).
Bodged HR processes.
Layers of new senior managers costing several million (even in some of the smallest systems).
A whole bunch of new leaders scratching their heads wondering what to do.
Focus as all been industrial action, acute bed pressures, elective backlogs.
Primary care all but forgotten, GP voices deliberately written out of legislation and governance.
Not to mention social care… not really part of the new system either.
Everyone playing the game of the emperor’s new clothes!

I’m sure the ICBs and ICSs will mature in time, but the rush to make it happen has exposed some serious flaws in not preparing the ground work. Let’s hope it is not a missed opportunity.

Douglas Callow 8 February, 2023 12:06 pm

or the alternative view .. NHS has been packaged up and readied for privatisation by successive governments
The Lansley reforms started the process and the austerity measures over the last 12 years accelerated by the inevitable chaos from COVID accelerated incentives to get the job done?

Thought for the day

“the class on whose behalf the Tory party fights has changed dramatically: where once it was doctors and lawyers, businessmen, “respectable people”, it is now hedge fund managers and property developers, the filthy, the super, the Croesus rich. If you’re less wealthy than Jacob Rees-Mogg, the party has fought a 12-year war against you, and – newsflash – it won.”

As Warren Buffett told the New York Times as long ago as 2006 ” There’s class warfare alright but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making the war, and we’re winning”

Where America leads, the UK follows..The war they are waging is really the ultra-privileged old-guard upper-class and their corporate paymasters against everyone else.

Feel free to disagree

Anonymous 8 February, 2023 7:27 pm

Same shit, different name.

Coastal GP 13 February, 2023 1:01 pm

Lack of leadership and no clue to what is going on on the ground.

Example :-

Suggestion by ICS urgent care “expert”…. why don’t we have GPs visiting patients at home in the Out of Hours period as this may stop them going to ED ?

I went home and had a chat with my dog as was desperate for an intelligent conversation.

Paul Hartley 13 February, 2023 8:00 pm

Yet another reorganisation. Will they ever learn?!