This site is intended for health professionals only


NHS England pushes forward with plans to implement single patient record

NHS England pushes forward with plans to implement single patient record
Getty

NHS England is pushing forward with plans to implement a single patient record, and is currently testing different models, it has announced.

A planned single patient record (SPR) which will make patients’ data visible to clinicians across different care settings is in a ‘test and learn’ phase, according to the commissioner. 

The Government has previously said it would introduce new legislation placing a duty on providers, including GP practices, to make the information they record about patients available to them.

Plans for the SPR were trailed by health secretary Wes Streeting last October and formally announced this year as part of the NHS 10-year health plan, which confirmed the SPR would be available to patients via the NHS App by 2028

Now NHS England has confirmed that the test phase will run through the autumn and culminate in a ‘programme business case’ and that the SPR would ‘provide a single version of the truth across care settings’.  

It said: ‘For the first time ever, patients will be given real control over a single, secure and authoritative account of their data and a single patient record to enable more co-ordinated, personalised and predictive care.

‘It will unify patient information from across the NHS, giving both patients and professionals secure access to a single, accurate and up-to-date record – wherever and whenever it’s needed. 

‘It will end many of the frustrations patients shared during our public engagement. No more repeated stories. No more appointments where clinicians are unaware of what happened previously.’  

It said the testing phase would explore three options for how the SPR would be built: 

  • Shared Care Record – Hub and Spoke: integrates existing regional Shared Care Records, linked via a central API (a ‘secure way’ for different systems to connect and share information); 
  • Central Integration Model: a centrally managed data store for real-time access; 
  • Virtual Data Layer: connects existing systems to provide a joined-up view at the point of accessing data. 

This phase of the SPR’s development would include ‘working with a small number of suppliers’ to test the three models.  

In an NHS England meeting last month, Ming Tang, its chief data and analytics officer and interim chief digital and information officer, said a resultant SPR ‘prototype’ would likely be ‘ready for review by the end of the year’. 

The Doctor’s Association UK GP co-lead Steve Taylor told Pulse that generally GPs have been ‘cautious’ about the implementation of the single patient record ‘on the basis that we are not sure whether or not the data will be secure, how much information will be available between different sources, and whether that would interfere with some of the more complex systems’.

He added: ‘I think there’s a more broad worry with a number of access issues over data breaches, so it is important that this is incredibly secure.

‘From a GP point of view, GPs have basically built the NHS database over the last 30 years, and have been incredibly secure at doing so, so there is some concern related to it being much more open.’

What the SPR means for clinicians

For clinicians, the SPR will be designed to offer:

  • a clear, unified view of a patient’s history – wherever they’ve received care
  • seamless access to be able to support care across all care settings, from primary, to acute, to community
  • better-informed decision-making and reduced administrative burden
  • safer, faster, and more coordinated care through a more collaborative approach, as the SPR will enable patients to read, update, and share joint care plans
  • the SPR will, wherever possible, build on and connect with existing systems – such as Electronic Patient Records, Shared Care Records, and the Federated Data Platform – rather than replacing them. Source systems will remain the clinical system of record

Source: NHS England

NHS England would not confirm to Pulse the names of the suppliers, but the announcement said ‘their involvement now will neither give them an advantage nor exclude them from future opportunities’. 

However, it did say the ‘SPR will, wherever possible, build on and connect with existing systems’ including the NHS Federated Data Platform (FDP) – intended to link together data from across NHS organisations to support both planning and direct care.

Palantir – a data analytics company known for its work with US intelligence and security agencies – was awarded a £330m, seven-year contract in 2023 to deliver the FDP.

Earlier this year, the BMA passed a motion at its annual representative meeting (ARM) urging the NHS to cut ties with the company – calling it ‘an unacceptable choice of partner’ to handle patient data.

NHS England also clarified in its announcement the Government would need to pass ‘new legislation that places a duty on every health and care provider to make the information they record about a patient accessible to that patient’. 

Community pharmacies will also be linked to the SPR, as the Government said it will increase their role in the management of long-term conditions.

Subject to parliamentary time, from 2028 patients will be able to view it on the NHS App and over time it will also include a ‘personalised account’ of health risk, drawing from lifestyle, demographic and genomic data.


			

READERS' COMMENTS [5]

Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles

Gerard Bulger 15 October, 2025 1:49 pm

A single access to data where it being held is one thing and very useful. The Australian system my health record works that way. Look up an old xsay done anywhere. This way you know the provenace of the data. You can also see last dispensed precriptoins and lab test and who did them But creating a single MERGED record was the madness of Connecting for Health. An example single line about allergy in a merged record casues chaos unless we can track down the origin and history.. A code alone will not do. The same for all entries. A single access point good, single record very bad.

David Church 15 October, 2025 11:41 pm

I don’t want to be forced to listen to the musical tastes of others. I think we should be allowed to use our own records and listen to whatever music we want in the privacy of our own stereo systems. One single record for all just will not do. not even th eone that went into space with the space-probe.

Douglas Callow 16 October, 2025 10:13 am

A single record will give foundation trusts incredible leverage when it comes to accountable care systems. Streeting, Milburn Darzi are very keen to re-energise FT’S as system leaders holding budgets for entire healthcare delivery.

Penelope Jarrett 28 October, 2025 7:12 pm

I already struggle with the size of the GP record when people have multiple LTC, even when I personally have curated it and kept it tidy. It can take 10 minutes to find the relevant information! Much quicker to ask the patient! I really do not want to have to wade through lots of detail added by every Tom, Dick and Harry in what will undoubtedly be an uncurated fashion. These grand schemes are dreamt up by people who do not actually have to use them.

Finola ONeill 18 November, 2025 4:51 pm

totally agree Penelope. The single record is not for our use or benefit. I don’t think it is for patient care. I think it is to allow tech billionaires to run AI on data and introduce AI programs. Palantir-Peter Thiel or Oracle Larry Ellison will get the contract. Liten to Blair interview Ellison at the world government forum in Dubai this year. NHS data, incredibly valuable but needs integration and organisation. And there you have your answer.
GP connect allow hospit al and out of hours teams access GP record. We have the best curated record anyway. No more write access needed; just clogs the record. IN GP records things are fairly well streamlined with communications, new journal, etc.
When I work out of hours I can see recent pathology results, recent GP encounters. There is nothing more other healthcare staff need above that access.
As for patients accessing their records. FFS. That is not the function of medical records; its to communicate with health professionals and coordinate and enable care. I don’t ask my mechanic for their records on my bloody car servicing. Patient don’t understand what any of it bloody means anyway.
I have appointments filled with worried well wanting explanations of why their Na is 131 or TSH 5.
I explained I’ve done 5 years pre grad and 25 years post grad and experience. Good luck with me explaining thyroid axis or lab error, normal variation etc.
Load of old bullshit created by a bullshit government who are only interested in funnelling your taxes into their billionaire donors pockets; Pharmaceutical industry, PFI developers, private health companies and tech billionaires.
Go figure