Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Revealed: Dozens of GPs quit CCG roles in first six months of commissioning amid concerns over workload

Exclusive At least 30 GPs have resigned their positions on CCG boards since the transfer of commissioning responsibility in April, amid fears that rising practice workload is preventing even enthusiasts from implementing the NHS reforms, a Pulse investigation reveals.

Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act from 74 CCGs across England show that one in three boards have seen a GP member resign since April, while the overall proportion of CCG board members who are GPs also appears to have declined, from an estimated 49% last year to just 43%.

In at least four regions - Hull, Lewisham, Luton and Wyre Forest - the chair of the CCG has left their role. Extrapolated across all 211 CCGs, the figures suggest up to 80 GP board members may have already stepped down.

Some CCG leaders who have resigned their posts have cited the increased workload caused by the contract imposition as a reason for stepping down, while the GPC claimed there will be more GPs having to give up their roles because of workload pressures. After the imposition of unfavourable GP contract terms in April, negotiators warned that many CCG leaders would find themselves unable to continue their roles.

Responding to Pulse’s findings, GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey said: ‘This is not a surprise and is a reflection not only of the workload and pressures of being involved in CCG work, but also of practice workload increasing dramatically - in large part as a result of the Government’s contract imposition - which means GPs are having to make the decision to spend more time in the practice to be able to cope with the workload there. 

‘It is also a sign that GPs are getting fed up of the controlling nature of some area teams and NHS England and the continuing dysfunction of the new fragmented healthcare system. I would certainly expect more to follow.’

Dr Helen Tattersfield, the former chair of Lewisham CCG, told Pulse last month that she had had to resign because of workload pressures.

She said at the time: ‘Because of the changes in the primary care contracting, there has been a lot of uncertainty about payment and claiming it, so [as a practice] we have had to concentrate to make sure things would happen, compared with the past when you knew the money you were getting.

‘There is extra QOF [work] and it all requires a lot more attention so it was difficult to balance those things.’

Dr Chandra Kanneganti, the former clinical director of unscheduled care on Stoke on Trent CCG, told Pulse in April he enjoyed commissioning but had to resign from the CCG board as his patients were his ‘main priority’.

But Dr Simon Gates, who announced this month he would be standing down from his role as chair of Wyre Forest CCG, said that he was stepping down because he had been in the role for three years, since the CCG was in shadow form. He said it was ‘right’ for a membership organisation to have turnover at the top.

He said: ‘My belief is that in a membership organisation, you cannot truly claim to be working well if you have not got rotation of the top clinical lead roles. We’ve worked hard to bring people on.’

However, he added that workload pressures meant he will be busier after stepping down and returning to a full-time GP role.

He said: ‘The thing I am most nervous about is that the GP job is so busy. Usually when you retire it is to spend more time with your family, but I might have to spend less time with my family.’

Dr Simon Poole, deputy chair of the GPC commissioning subcommittee and a GP in Cambridge, said there was an increasing demand on practices.

He said: ‘It may well be that some partners are having to come back to their practice as a result of the contract changes… If the Government are struggling to maintain the engagement of clinical leaders in commissioning activities because of how busy it is in practices then they will be struggling even more with getting grassroots GPs in practices to continue to be engaged in CCGs.’

Pulse’s investigation also revealed that the proportion of GPs sitting on boards appears to have fallen since last year. GPs represented 406 out of 949 board positions - just under 43%. A similar Pulse investigation last year covering 100 CCGs revealed that GPs held 49% of the positions on boards.

Readers' comments (12)

  • Pulse non-story. There are 211 CCGs with say 6 GPs on each. So 30 GPs resigning is a turnover of 2% in the first six months or annual 4%. Thats just what you would expect (even a bit low) for any organisation

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ivan Benett

    Just 30 and two chairs, that must be par with natural turn over. I think you're being too sensationalist about this. Certainly CCGs may not be what people thought they would be, in that we have to work within rules and budgets, and make difficult decisions. It's not for the faint hearted. To picture this as somehow a mass walk out is hardly the case. How about a piece on how GPs are making a positive change to improve services, and enjoying the challenge of service reform?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just to clarify, 30 GP board members including four chairs have resigned across the 74 CCGs who responded to our FOI request - the figure across the total 211 CCGs is likely to be much higher.

    The turnover rate is probably closer to about 7.5% - as you say, some turnover is to be expected but that perhaps seems high for the first six months of commissioning responsibility?

    Steve Nowottny
    Editor, Pulse

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I dont think Govt wil care if many CCG GPs walk away now. they have done their job. Been used to bring in CCGs as agents of privatisation. BSUs, NHS England, Monitor will finish off the job with a dwindling number of GP "enthusiasts" left as decoration or to be wheeled out to give quotes for DH/Govt feel-good announcements.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There must be many senior GP's who have spent many years dealing with patients and are now only too happy to move into an administrative role on a CCG.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I quit a few months ago- workload going up in practice doing ccg work at home at night, really felt I would burn out if carried on. Now I am aware of not so much CCG members strufggling- but their partners finding things tough with an absent partner doing ccg work, poor locum supply, increasing workload being passed on. what was intresting is that I was the only GP without grey hair/close to retirement on our board. No real encouragement for GP`s who haven`t had a political/portfolio career to sign up.Give it a few years and there won`t be any GP`s to replace those on the board.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A politically driven construct to fractionate Primary Care.
    Sucker punch nonsense, put GPs in admin front line wearing the emperor's new clothes . Naturally the edifice will crash and burn.Scapegoat GP s who wind up as happy as the Holman Hunt painting before even more of the NHS is Bransonised.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr Chandra Kanneganti, the former clinical director of unscheduled care on Stoke on Trent CCG, told Pulse in April he enjoyed commissioning but had to resign from the CCG board as his patients were his ‘main priority’.

    ''He has rejoined the CCG commissioning board'' for information sake.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • the CCG and the notion that the organisation is GP led is an eyewash
    we still feel enormous barriers from the managers in the name of governance
    unfortunately the younger GPs have been brain washed that CCG cannot engage with private firms to enhance services smartly
    there are AOs from management who call themselves as Chief Officers -who control the activity and not GPs and if any GP raises their concerns they are quietened
    its a sad affair and I can see the future in private hands totally telling the GPs what they need to do

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NO surprise there. ccg gp's are busy to improve services and attending meeting after meetings. they are not their lot of time to see patients. either locum or it is a burden on those partners who cover.
    replacing task of pct to ccg to save money will back fire soon.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say