Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP commissioners should involve out-of-area GPs in decisions to avoid conflicts of interest, says Monitor

CCGs should involve out-of-area GPs or other CCGs when deciding whether to commission services relating to GP practices to avoid conflicts of interest, according to the regulator Monitor.

Monitor has issued guidance on procurement, patient choice and competition regulations, designed to set out the criteria the regulator expects CCGs to use in making procurement decisions.

It states that commissioners should consider using competition as a way of driving up the quality and efficiency of the services supplied by GP practices and other providers.

This comes as commissioners have expressed doubts about how to comply with competition regulations that state that they must put services out to tender unless they can prove they can be provided by only one provider.

The guidance addresses the issue of conflict of interests when CCGs are deciding ‘whether to commission services that would reduce demand for services provided by GP practices under the NHS General Medical Services contract’.

In circumstances such as this, the guidance says, CCGs should involve out-of area GPs or other CCGs: ‘It may be possible for a CCG to manage a conflict affecting a substantial proportion of its members by involving third parties who are not conflicted in the decision-making by the CCG, such as out-of-area GPs, other clinicians with relevant experience, individuals from a health and wellbeing board or independent lay persons.’

Monitor´s guidance also attempts to clarify competition rules. It states: ‘Competition between providers, whether to attract patients or to obtain contracts to provide services, can incentivise providers to improve both the quality of the services they provide and value for money.’

’What will work best for any given service will depend on the circumstances. For example, providers earn income for many elective services, based on the volumes of patients they treat. A provider’s income is therefore dependent on the number of patients they are able to attract. Patients may choose to go to particular providers for a range of reasons such as reputation, clinical outcomes and waiting times.’

Readers' comments (6)

  • Err this is rather odd advice. Half of the OOH GPs are local GPs that are taking on extra work outside of contracted hours, whilst the other most of the other half are locums or career OOH GPs who don't want to be involved in this kind of thing to begin with.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Out of area not out of hours.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • >Out of area not out of hours.

    Oh dear.

    Reading comprehension fail.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The make-it-up-as-we-go-along brigade are in full cry. What a complicated mess. They created this for a market, for their donors, for everyone but the patient. As for Monitor, well, they were designed by industry, for industry. Nightmare

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Bush

    "commissioners should consider using competition as a way of driving up the quality and efficiency of the services supplied by GP practices and other providers"
    Our big challenge at present is to find ways to support GPs so that they are able to continue providing the high quality services that they provide now, against very difficult odds. We really do not need to make it tougher on a practice to provide services. That is called shooting oneself in the foot.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I wasn't too far away from the right when 2 years ago I forecasted a privatization of the NHS. My big question here is: how can we still define NHS as a charitable organization if it does deliver most services by means on non-charitable companies? It seems to me that any contracted company should be a charity to attract an NHS contract. Perhaps, this would help...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say