This site is intended for health professionals only
Wednesday 23 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

Herpes simplex testing 'does no psychological harm'

By Laura Passi | 22 Sep 2011

Diagnosis of the herpes simplex virus type 2 through serological testing does not cause long-term psychosocial harm in people who had no previous history of the virus.

Researchers systematically reviewed nine studies which looked at changes in the sexual attitude and mental health of patients following diagnosis.

While the study found some literature describes heightened rates of anxiety, distress and sexual dissatisfaction after diagnosis, the researchers found serological testing did not have any lasting adverse psychosocial affects, and concluded that concerns about sustained emotional impact should not deter GPs from offering testing.

Dr Christine Johnston, from the University of Washington Virology Research Clinic, Seattle said: ‘Broader testing would allow HSV-2-positive persons to receive appropriate treatment for undiagnosed HSV-2-related symptoms, and would allow both HSV-2-seropositive and seronegative persons to receive herpes counselling and education.'

Sex Transm Infect 2001, published early online 8 September

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous, Practice Manager,
23 Sep 2011
Having herpes is not such a major problem as contracting HIV or HPV however in the dating game herpes is still a very difficult scenario to deal with. HerpesSupport.net is designed especially for people who are suffering from any form of STD so that they can find others just like them. Not only will you find like minded people on this HIV, HPV and herpes dating site but you may just find the partner of your dreams.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Peter English, Sessional/Locum GP,
26 Sep 2011
Does screening for HSV2 meet the Wilson and Jungner criteria (or the more recent adaptations thereof)?

I'd be surprised.

http://www.ganfyd.org/index.php?title=Screening
Average (0Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Other healthcare professional,
29 Sep 2011
Cervical Screening doesn't meet the Wilson & Jungner criteria either, but it's still a national program!

Important condition - Cervical cancer is rare.

Untreated natural history understood - Do we know which lesions will be cleared naturally, and why? Did we know about HPV when the program was initiated.

Acceptable to patients - How many women have been scared or bullied into accepting screening?
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Is self-care the answer to the NHS efficiency drive? Read the full story here