This site is intended for health professionals only
Wednesday 23 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

Gerada: Five years to save general practice

By Gareth Iacobucci | 13 Dec 2011

Exclusive RCGP chair Dr Clare Gerada has warned there are just five years to save general practice from ‘unravelling' after the NHS reforms go through.

The warning was issued during Pulse's commissioning roundtable debate that took place last week, in which Dr Gerada said she was ‘fearful' that GPs will become too pre-occupied with reducing activity ‘rather than caring' in the new commissioning world.

Dr Gerada issued a rallying call to the senior clinicians at the debate, representing the BMA, NHS Alliance, and NAPC, imploring them to safeguard the future of general practice.

Dr Gerada said: ‘The most important thing to me is general practice. I love it. I've been a GP for 30 years, and I think it is the answer to the health service.'

'We've got about five years, if these reforms go through, before general practice starts to unravel like it has done in other countries.'

‘The numbers coming will decrease, the pay will decrease, our professionalism will decrease, and those around this table are the only people that can protect our profession. Not because it's protectionism, but because it's the right thing – it's what makes the NHS fairer, safer, kinder and cheaper.'

The debate also saw the GPC and RCGP call for a wholesale restructure of clinical commissioning groups, with mergers to ensure giant ‘super-CCGs' cover a population of between one and five million patients – and prevent GPs ‘losing the power to commission independently'.

GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey said mergers were essential given some large hospital trusts had already been told they would be dealing with commissioning support organisations in future, effectively cutting CCGs out of the loop.

He said: ‘I've already heard large providers talking to the Department of Health. It is saying to them "you will be in conversation with the commissioning support organisations in the future – not with the CCGs but with the support organisations". This is the agenda.'

The new push for ‘super-CCGs' marks a shift in policy for the GPC, which had previously warned CCGs below 500,000 population could struggle to control costs. The GPC said the move was necessary to prevent smaller groups becoming ‘dependant on external support', following the release of controversial Government guidance opening up NHS management to private competition.

The NHS Operating Framework recently gave SHA clusters until March 2012 to resolve ‘any outstanding configuration issues' among the 250-odd CCGs currently established. Last week, the Mid Cornwall and Kernow CCGs in Cornwall announced plans to merge into one CCG covering 464,800 patients, while GPs in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough have backed plans to pursue a single CCG covering 850,000 patients.

Speaking during the debate, Dr Gerada and Dr Vautrey agreed that the announcement of a £25 per head management allowance had made mergers a priority.

Dr Gerada said: ‘One to five million population…is the only way. Then you can start to have population base, you can start to be employing the right people. I think we've got about five years, if these reforms go through, before general practice starts to unravel like it has done in other countries.'

Dr Gerada said only large CCGs would be able to resist farming commissioning support out to the private sector: ‘Otherwise they won't have the economies of scale. You have to have CCGs that are very large.'

At the end of last week GPC chair Dr Laurence Buckman issued a letter to the profession on the GPC's change in policy, revealing negotiators planned to fight for a ‘substantial increase' in the management fee: ‘We do not consider the proposed £25 per head to be sufficient.'

Pulse Roundtable: Debating the NHS reforms

Click here for the full transcript of Pulse's roundtable on the NHS reforms

READERS' COMMENTS

Edoardo Cervoni, Private GP,
13 Dec 2011
I do not share the General Practice vision of the RCGP chair, which I would describe as "pyramidal" with a very large base. First and foremost, there is no evidence to backup the idea that the care so delivered may be more qualitative and cost-effective. Secondly, it may well lead to different outcomes applying the concept in London or in Cumbria for instance. I am afraid too many GPS may have been tempted to be business managers rather than operating on the frontline. I would be interested in reviewing th time spent in consultations among principal GPs, Nurses, Salaried GPs and locums over the last 10 years to check on trends. Likewise, I would ask patients what do they value the most in their relationship with the GP. Finally, I am not sure about the "unravel" General Practice in other Countries. I would like to know more about it.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Edoardo Cervoni, Private GP,
13 Dec 2011
Sorry about GPS, I meant GPs...Probably it was a lapsus calami hiding my inconscious desire for a Global Positioning System (GPS) for our profession.
Average (1Vote)
Top
Vinci Ho, GP Partner,
13 Dec 2011
I can see the reality bites where CCGs have to be larger as £25 per head is rediculously low but one should also list the potential risks and disadvantages of going so big in size.
I think what we are talking is protecting all General Practices , Great and Small ..........
Average (0Votes)
Top
Edoardo Cervoni, Private GP,
13 Dec 2011
Vinci Ho, once again I agree with your point too. May I also add that I have the greatest respect for Dr Gerada. However, I do not think we should go ahead with anything with do not believe to be in the best patients' interest, scientifically sound, and possibly tested. I am herein arguing that large CCGs may be not the best option at all. I may be already leading an economically successful group of GP Practices, let's say in London, but how can I expect the same model may apply elsewhere? Population density, for instance, may be a problem. The population of the North East is the lowest of the English regions and one of the slowest growing. The percentage of the population aged 65 and over is projected to be one of the fastest growing among the regions.
The region’s population was 2.6 million in mid-2010, 5.0 per cent of the population of England. From 2001 to 2010, the population of the North East grew by 2.6 per cent compared with 5.6 per cent for the whole of England, making it one of the slowest growing regions in England.
We are speaking about £25 per head. If the concept is wrong or need some improvement, this is exactly what we should focus on.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Peter Patel, Manager,
13 Dec 2011
Are these really reforms of the NHS? The more DoH and government unveil their plans, the more I am convinced that this is a step-wise privatisation of the NHS and demise of General Practice. It is clear that CCGs are not going to outsource just plain back office functions. The new proposals to develop Commissioning Support Organisations (also called CSU or CSS) as external competitive non-NHS groups and their suggested functions clearly indicates that the government is privatising core functions of the PCTs. In terms of improving health of the community, majority of the GPs and their leaders have already forgotten about addressing health inequalities in their communities and the focus for several months has been on CCG development and power bargaining. I wonder how GPs will react when their clinical decisions and activity will be performance managed by their own colleagues. These reforms will give birth to a General Practice in England with no clinical clout or independent thinking.

Dr Peter Patel, CEO, South Birmingham Independent Commissioners
Average (3Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Practice Manager,
15 Dec 2011
As much as five years? I doubt there will be an NHS in five years. I reckon all the pension changes etc are designed to make many more experienced GPs leave; making it easier to brow beat less experienced colleagues and will inexorably lead to the privatisation of the NHS. I fear for my children and grandchildren.
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Is self-care the answer to the NHS efficiency drive? Read the full story here