This site is intended for health professionals only
Thursday 24 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

Fifth of GPs would not use their local hospital

By Andrew McNicoll | 15 Feb 2012

Exclusive: A significant minority of GPs have personally experienced a poor standard of care at their local hospital, with many citing deficiencies in personal care as the chief failing.

Pulse's survey of 500 GPs, conducted with sister title Practical Commissioning, found more than a fifth would not use their local hospital if they or their family needed substantial specialist care.

While 64% of GPs rated the clinical care at their local hospital as ‘good' or ‘very good', only 44% gave a similar rating for speed and efficiency, and just 38% for communication or personal care. Hospitals were accused of treating some patients ‘as on a factory production line'.

Some 21% of GPs said they would not use their hospital if they or their family needed substantial specialist care. Where the GP or a family member had recently used their hospital, 64% said the care was of a high standard, but 18% said it was not.

A GP in the North East said: ‘I felt when my wife went in for surgery she was in a tunnel where she went in one side and came out the other as if on a factory production line. There seemed to be no appreciation of the human side to her care.'

A GP in south London, who asked not to be named, said substandard nursing care was common: ‘Patients not being fed, not being washed, the sort of nursing care that none of us would want ourselves or for

our patients. It is quite concerning.'

Dr Martin Wolfson, a GP in Surbiton, Surrey, said: ‘The local hospital is fine if you are young, fit and articulate, but if it was your grandfather, it wouldn't happen. It's money-driven and it's lost the personal touch.'

Dr Tony Brzezicki, a GP in Croydon and member of Croydon CCG, was one of those to say he would not choose his local hospital: ‘The biggest issue is how poor patient experience is. Survey results are poor and have been for a number of years, even if outcomes are good.'

Dr Adam Skinner, a GP in Kent, said: ‘[I am] very pleased with the Tunbridge Wells hospital at Pembury. I wouldn't send my dog to Princess Royal University Hospital at Farnborough.'

South London Healthcare NHS Trust said it had significantly improved its mortality rates, while Croydon Health Services said there had been a ‘marked improvement' in patient experience. Kingston Hospital NHS Trust in Surrey said CQC inspectors had recently praised it for treating patients with ‘kindness and respect'.

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous, GP Partner,
15 Feb 2012
Who look after local hospitals? Does PCT have any role to maintain the standards?
Your next article would be;

Fifth of GPs would not use their local PCT

or

No GP would use local PCT
Average (0Votes)
Top
Simon Ruffle, GP Partner,
15 Feb 2012
Not a great moment to publish this Lansley and cronies will see it as a reason to spin that the NHS needs reforming and of course GPs are leading this. Services will not improve in hospitals whilst the funding disappears into private wallets.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Practice Manager,
15 Feb 2012
A number of questions that follow from this:
1) What proportion of GPs have private medical insurance?
2) What proportion of consultants have private medical insurance?
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Will online booking ease the 8am rush?Read the full story here