Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Pain, but no gain?

In another note from the dark side, Dr Paul Zollinger-Read looks at PCT methods to reduce GP referrals.

In another note from the dark side, Dr Paul Zollinger-Read looks at PCT methods to reduce GP referrals.



Some of you may have noticed the King's Fund released a report recently on referral management systems. This is a crucial bit of bedtime reading for all developing GP commissioning groups….in fact it's a cracking good read.

The tide of referral growth continues on its relentless upward rise with something like a 4% growth this year compared to last. No one fully understands the reasons behind this growth although there is general agreement that it can't all be pathological and we can't afford it.

PCTs have struggled with this for some time and various solutions have been tried.

We use a supportive approach - I have a first-class public health team that did a similar evidence review to the King's Fund (GP commissioners note - good public health is worth its weight in gold) and they came to the conclusion that we should use a scheme of peer review and encouragment to use referral pathways.

Others have tried naked rationing, but this seems to give short-term gain but also a lot of pain. Although half the PCTs studied believed that their referral management schemes had managed to curtail demand, the evidence did not agree.

The study concluded that a referral management strategy built around peer review and audit, supported by consultant feedback, with clear referral criteria and evidence-based guidelines is most likely to be both cost- and clinically-effective.

Changing referral behavior is far from simple and will require strong clinical leadership from both primary and secondary care, and strong collaboration between primary secondary and community care.

The report points to some other successful strategies such as referral pathways, a focus on reducing procedures of limited clinical value, and comparative benchmarking feedback to GPs.

There's nothing new here but it is very helpful as this is one of the most important challenges we face.

At present our referral rates have fallen by 4% so the approach seems to work. It has yet to translate into a reduction in elective procedures, but the approaches of peer support and collaboration between primary and secondary care seem to be two essential ingredients that we need to build upon.

Dr Paul Zollinger-Read is a GP and chief executive of NHS Cambridgeshire

Click here for more Notes from the Dark Side

Dr Paul Zollinger-Read More on GP commissioning at the NAPC Annual Conference

A top line-up of expert speakers – including Sir David Nicholson, Mark Britnell and Stephen Dorrell MP - will be addressing the latest developments in GP commissioning at the NAPC Annual Conference in Birmingham in October.


To find out more and book your place today please click here.

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say