This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

BAME GPs at higher risk

Efforts are being made to protect black, Asian and minority ethnic GPs from Covid-19, reports Jaimie Kaffash

It became apparent early on that ethnicity could be an independent risk factor for Covid-19 and that black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) people were facing worse outcomes than white people.

Tragically, this is particularly true within general practice. As of 22 May, 11 GPs had died from Covid-19. Of those 11, ten were BAME. And a number of groups are recommending moving BAME GPs away from face-to-face consultations.

‘If practices have not yet done a risk assessment, I urge them to do it and protect their BAME staff,’ says British International Doctors Association chair Dr Chandra Kanneganti. ‘If risk is high, BAME GPs should be avoiding face-to-face consultations and working remotely.’

Health leaders acknowledge the risk. Public Health England announced at the start of May it was publishing a rapid review into whether BAME people are more adversely affected by Covid-19, reviewing thousands of health records with an initial focus on frontline workers, specifically doctors and nurses.

As early as 27 April, some secondary care providers took matters into their own hands, with trusts in Lincolnshire and Somerset recognising BAME staff as ‘vulnerable and at risk’. Two days later NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens wrote to GP practices, advising partners to ‘make appropriate arrangements’ to protect their BAME staff on a ‘precautionary basis’. These included ‘working remotely or in a lower-risk area’.

saad table 1050x567px


NHS England ran a webinar in early May on its support for BAME doctors. It recommended the risk-reduction framework, led by Professor Kamlesh Khunti of the University of Leicester, which sets out five factors for assessing practice staff: first, age – anyone over 70 is at extra risk; second, sex – around 60% of people admitted to hospital are male; third, underlying health conditions; fourth, ethnicity; and fifth, pregnancy over 28 weeks.

However, for some GPs this was not pragmatic enough, only instructing employers to ‘consider’ factors when making decisions. Rochdale and Bury LMCs chair Dr Mohammed Jiva says: ‘We are very disappointed with the lack of an adequate risk assessment tool for the BAME GP community from NHS England, which has resulted in local clinicians developing a local solution.’

A group of Greater Manchester GPs, led by Dr Jiva, produced a tool to gauge risk, the Safety Assessment and Decision scorecard (SAAD), which commemorates their deceased colleague, Dr Saad Al-Dubbaisi. The scorecard assigns points to the risk factors and adds obesity and vitamin D deficiency to those identified by Professor Khunti’s group.

The SAAD scorecard has been criticised for a lack of occupational health input but Dr Zahid Chauhan, a GP and one of its co-authors, says the group felt the need for a more pragmatic tool to allow GPs to decide their own risk. ‘This is not an occupational health matter – it is a HR matter,’ he says. In other words, GPs and staff – not employers or commissioners – should self-assess and decide whether they should be working on the front line.

Manchester LMCs chair Dr Amir Hannan says the SAAD scorecard is proving popular because ‘it was grounded, produced by frontline BAME GPs and relevant to general practice’.

We are very disappointed at the response at the national level

Dr Mohammed Jiva

One thing the authors of all risk tools seem to agree on is that those at the highest risk should avoid patient-facing roles. Professor Khunti’s guidance says ‘roles which are not directly patient facing are emerging and could be used as redeployment opportunities’, while the SAAD tool list tasks that can be done, and those to avoid.

In smaller practices – or those in areas with a high proportion of BAME GPs – this might be easier said than done. Dr Chauhan says: ‘This will start a discussion on risk management for singlehanded BAME GPs. As things open up, and more patients attend general practice, you could argue there is a higher risk of infection in primary care. GPs can speak to PCNs to put alternative arrangements in place.’

But east London GP and PCN clinical director Dr Farzana Hussain says in an area like hers, this is impossible. ‘Of the 19 GP partners in Newham Central 1 PCN, serving 67,000 residents, all but one are BAME, and 14 are men,’ she says.

‘This idea that networks will save the day is a fallacy. A tool is only useful if you can implement it. Someone has to see patients face to face.’

Dr Hussain adds that it is harder for partners, as they also have duties as employers. ‘How do I say to a practice nurse that I can protect her? If my staff are high risk, what can I do?’

It is also notable that the majority of BAME GPs – especially singlehanders – work in inner cities, where population density is highest. And there was already a recruitment crisis before the pandemic.

Without intervention from the top, GPs in this position face a huge dilemma. Dr Hussain says: ‘I have psychologically resigned myself to more deaths. I can’t find an answer, and I don’t think it is anyone’s fault. We can’t close general practice – we would break the NHS.’

The British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin has held talks with NHS leaders on the issue. Its president Dr Ramesh Mehta tells Pulse adequate PPE would help. He says: ‘Appropriate PPE is still not available. GPs were informed that certain costs can be claimed back but the official line is that equipment that isn’t part of standard [Public Health England] PPE doesn’t get refunded. So the GPs who’ve purchased gowns or better masks for staff won’t see a refund. This only encourages primary care facilities to stick with PHE guidance, which we know is inadequate.’

Dr Jiva agrees GPs of all ethnicities scoring high ‘need to raise the issue of enhanced PPE with their CCG in line with WHO recommendations’.

He also points out what he sees as a further risk factor: ‘There is emerging data around vitamin D and Covid-19, and all ethnicities may benefit from taking this supplement.’ However, there is as yet no official advice on the subject.

For Dr Hussain, there are few silver linings for singlehanded BAME GPs but she says GPs’ ability to innovate is one. ‘We are getting digitally savvy, and can do most consultations remotely. And I’ve never seen so much learning and sharing. For example, our [drive-in] childhood vaccinations scheme meant nurses only had two minutes’ contact, reducing risk.’

It may be that such innovation turns out to be the best protection for the most vulnerable GPs.

Related images

  • asian doctor alamy a373 px 525x350px
gp heroes nominations2020 180x250px

Rate this article  (4.5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (10)

  • 'I have psychologically resigned myself to more deaths.'
    Really ? You would fight for your patients lives but not your colleagues?
    'I can’t find an answer, and I don’t think it is anyone’s fault'
    It is someones fault!
    The government for not acting fast enough.
    PHE, NHSE/I etc for not being clear, for not doing anything sooner.
    The CCGs for not supplying adequate PPE to BAME GPs as soon as possible,and if they couldn't find it, shouting loud and clear that lives are at risk!
    BAME GPs at risk (anyone over 50?) should only see patients with full PPE and the patients should wear adequate face covering. If the throat is to be examined the patient can take a picture on their phones or NOT see a BAME GP and sent via 111. The room should be wiped down after every patient is seen, especially door handles/taps etc.
    'First do no harm'-isnt that what we sign up to? Sending doctors in to see patients unprotected when we know they have a high risk of death is certainly doing harm.

    “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”― Edmund Burke

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cranky Dragon. Your response is excellent.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When will the profession cleanse themselves of sick brainwashing and belittled altruism, and grow some serious self-respect, dignity and empathy FOR YOURSELF, fast.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • more men than women have died--are you addressing that?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Cranky Dragon You beat me to it - great post

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Are we not supposed to follow the science rather than purely skin colour? Although there may be an increased risk with BAME (hardly a genetic subtype surely?!) I note that a large proportion of the GPs who have unfortunately died were older than the average ‘pale’ GP. Although being female and pale may be protective age certainly isn’t.
    Some ethnicities are more prone to certain conditions eg diabetes and Vit D deficiency. Are these the major risk factors or skin colour? All the variables need to be taken into account before we start making rules based on melanin alone. As an old overweight male with Ca am I more or less at risk than a young Asian female?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If there is ‘blame’ it’s that economics won out over life & death and looks likely to win again with the early unlocking.

    Two independent analyses have suggested that had we locked down one week earlier we would have saved 3/4 of the lives lost 25,000+ of all hues. 20:20 vision and a retrospectoscope is great if you have one but stats suggest a day here or there REALLY can make a difference - So, Boris your money or (y)our life?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can some one please shed light on the number of GPs who died from the start of pandemic to today 30 May.
    How many BAME?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • so are males--dont count if they are white?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • BAME - this is a dumb term and I have no idea why it has currency. 'Black' is this a chromatographic scale. 'Minority ethnic' - surely every ethnicity is a minority compared to the universal set.

    Intelligent people, stop using it

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say