Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Hospital doctors need more training in general practice

Never mind GPs training in hospitals, we need more hospital doctors to spend time in general practice, argues Dr Thomas Abraham

In general practice, patients stay and diseases come and go. In hospitals, diseases stay and patients come and go. (Heath, I. BMJ 1995, 311:373) 

While GPs have sailed through the waters of hospital specialties and deal with all specialties on a day to day basis, general practice is uncharted territory for hospital doctors. Significant difficulties occur in patient care due to hospital doctors’ poor understanding of the modus operandi of GPs.

Ninety-five percent of patients’ contact is with GPs and most of the issues are dealt with at primary care level. Only a small percentage needs secondary care involvement like admissions of referrals. Admissions tend to cause much friction between GPs and hospital doctors. A few years back, I was doing a night visit at 2 am. The patient was a 23-year-old woman, a single parent with two-year-old daughter, living on her own on the 5th floor of a tower block. The clinical picture was appendicitis.

When I requested her admission, the hospital doctor was rather insisting on rectal examination findings. The doctor was purely checking the possible diagnosis and not visualising the predicament of the GPs who had assessed the case and made a decision that the patient could not be managed in her own home in the middle of the night, and needed hospitalisation. This, I believe, is due to the tunnel vision of specialist doctors, failing to visualise the danger in carrying out the procedure, something that could turn out to be career threatening in the situation. In my own experience, there have been various similar examples over the years.

Often, patients view the hospital as a transit lounge since they know that they are there only for a limited time and are well aware they will go back to the GP shortly. Also many patients talk highly about their GPs. This attitude of patients can irritate many hospital doctors, since they feel undervalued and underestimated for their services. For the hospital doctor, dealing with patient lasts a few days or weeks but for GP, the commitment is lifelong until retirement or death. If two people have to ride a horse, one has to sit in the back. Naturally the horse prefers the familiar rider than the short term one.

While hospital doctor has thorough knowledge of the speciality he is working, GP has broad working knowledge of all conditions affecting all ages and extending over all specialities. Moreover GP is not just clinician but has various other roles – family practitioner, counsellor, disease interpreter, administrator, social worker, gate keeper, primary care leader and so on.

The hospital doctor’s responsibility often ends with the discharge letter. Also, in the hospital setting, the burden is shared and the buck stops with the consultant. For GP, the buck starts and stops with him.

A group from the European Working Party in Family Practice (EQuiP), involving over 20 European colleges of primary care, has found that the quality of care at the interface between general practice and specialists needs much improvement. Many patients feel that they are left in limbo when care is being transferred from one branch to another.

The European Task Force on Quality in General practice (EUROPEP) has developed an instrument to measure patients’ evaluation of quality in general practice. Also, benchmarking of hospitals has been in force over many years. With the rapid advent of social media, patients have become much more knowledgeable about their health care and rights.

The General Practice Forward View set up a working group in September 2016 to (a) improve communication between primary and secondary care, (b) include new measures in the NHS Standard Contract to improve processes across the interface, and (c) identify and share best practice and innovative ways of working.

One of the key recommendations by EQuiP is that specialists should be trained in the patterns of diseases, signs and symptoms within primary care system as well as those presenting to specialist practice. All trainees should have appropriate training and insight into possible organisational problems at the primary – secondary care interface from both patients’ and providers’ perspectives. These can only be achieved by spending enough time in general practice.

If two years of hospital medicine is part of GP training, in my view, every hospital specialist doctor ought to spend at least one month per year in general practice. Rather than viewing ‘my patient’ and ‘your patient’ we all need to view it as ‘our patient’ and medical profession needs to work ‘hand in glove’ among all branches and cadres to achieve the common goal of best possible holistic patient care.

Dr Thomas Abraham is a GP in Hull

Rate this article  (4.25 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (4)

  • They need training because as time goes by with fewer GPs they will be seeing much off the waifs and strays we do and they can't do serum rheubarb and multiple scan on every one before they make a clinical decision.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • “Also many patients talk highly about their GPs. This attitude of patients can irritate many hospital doctors, since they feel undervalued and underestimated for their services. For the hospital doctor, dealing with patient lasts a few days or weeks but for GP, the commitment is lifelong until retirement or death. If two people have to ride a horse, one has to sit in the back. Naturally the horse prefers the familiar rider than the short term one”

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...

    I’d be delighted to let you sit in on my consultations and listen to what patients really say about their GPs. Let’s just say quite a lot of it is completely unprintable...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And every GP should do six months in psychiatry as half of their patients have a mental health issue but they won’t

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I certainly think a degree of GP exposure by hospital docs would be beneficial. Clearly the hospital doctor who asked about the PR was stalling and wasting time. Unnecessary information since it doesn't change the fact that the patient needs to be referred. If the hospital doctors discharge without any investigations then I would be happy to sit in their clinics and learn accordingly but if not then thanks but no thanks!

    Ps some of the things that patients say about hospital drs are equally unprintable. Try dealing with multiple medical problems and complete all generated paperwork in 10 minutes with relatively few tests and no consultant to ask about everything and see how you well you perform!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say