Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

QOF reforms 'may have little effect' on bureaucracy

The planned removal of 341 QOF points from the GP contract next year may have relatively little effect on GP bureaucracy and workload, a leading QOF analyst has warned.

The removal of the points, with 238 being put into the global sum and 103 going towards the new emergency admission DES, was hailed by the GPC and NHS England following the outcome of the 2014/15 contract negotiations, while a Pulse survey this week revealed 73% of GPs supported the removal of QOF points.

But Swindon GP Dr Gavin Jamie - who owns the QOF Database website – said GPs will have to do much of the same work, and the effect on bureaucracy will be ‘slight’.

Dr Jamie said: ‘There will be slightly less bureaucracy because patients won’t have to come in at specific times to do certain tests. But we are not going to stop treating things like thyroid disease so the overall effect could be fairly neutral.’

He criticised the decision to retain QOF points for simply keeping registers of patients with certain conditions, with no payments linked to actual treatment.

He said: ‘For epilepsy you will have QOF points for keeping a register but there is no indicator. There just doesn’t seem to be any point of keeping a register if there’s no activity around it.’

The GPC said last week that the QOF changes would free up GPs’ time because certain tasks - such as blood pressure monitoring for hypertension patients and indicators relating to keeping a hypothyroidism register and monitoring patients - are being retired.

Readers' comments (4)

  • No surprise there then

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is all a smokescreen from the Hunt.
    CQC are the new box-ticking, red-tape dictator and will simply demand all this box-ticking as a "quality marker".....unpaid of course. Fine, don't do it and get de-registered!!
    Hunt is a disingenuous and manipulative Politician...not uncommon then!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The bureaucracy acnnot decrease- What the hell would all our management and administrators do if this was decreased.
    Its only there to keep them employed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Of course there is a pinmt for keeping a register of patients but no treatment - so that they can be sold to private companies who can then send them information of their services! Remember Hunts past - he's not adverse to promoting organisations that pay for personal information, to be used for their own financial gain (oh sorry it was his spad that does all the promoting against his leadership! If he can't even control a spad how could he possible control a health service?) GPs a re just the information gatherers for the development of more appropriate health services now!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say