This site is intended for health professionals only


Who is new health secretary Steve Barclay?

Who is new health secretary Steve Barclay?

This is an updated version of the article posted in July, when Steve Barclay first became health secretary

Following the departure of Sajid Javid as health secretary, Prime Minister Boris Johnson immediately installed Steve Barclay, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office as Javid’s replacement in July.

He was replaced in September, when Liz Truss became prime minister and installed Therese Coffey as health secretary.

In his two months as health secretary, Mr Barclay didn’t make too many waves, although he did approve a 4.5% pay rise for NHS staff, including recommending the rise for salaried GPs and practice staff – however, this did not come with a funding increase for GP practices.

Mr Barclay had served as health minister before – from January to November 2018. But he was most notable for being a Johnson loyalist and a fervent supporter of the leave campaign.

While Mr Barclay didn’t make huge waves as a health minister either, it seems as though he has some form for campaigns around GPs.

In 2012, he whipped up a storm by claiming that GPs were receiving £1.6m for ‘writing neatly’. He told the Times: ‘If it wasn’t so serious it really would be funny,’ he said. ‘The reason for highlighting this is to show up a culture of a lack of accountability within the NHS.

Article continues below this sponsored advert
Advertisement

A year later, he wrote on Conservative Home about the case of Dr Daniel Ubani, who unlawfully killed a patient by injecting them with 100mg of diamorphine.

Mr Barclay wrote: ‘Five years on, the Department of Health’s decision to draw up a nationwide register of doctor’s [sic] with proven language skills and medical expertise will prevent those unfit to practice like Daniel Ubani from simply moving from one health authority to another. It will also protect future patients and prevent families like David Gray’s from experiencing the heartache of the avoidable death of a loved one.

‘The need for cross-border checks on foreign doctors is all the more pressing given the GMC’s admission that in the last five years, 63% of doctors struck off or suspended were trained outside the UK.’

And in 2014, he continued a campaign against GPs who remove themselves from the medical register before facing a GMC hearing. He told the Telegraph at the time: ‘There is a systemic failure in the disciplinary process that applies to doctors which gives insufficient weight to patients and their families. Voluntary erasure enables GPs to play for time, delay disciplinary hearings and then to walk away before they have concluded.

‘There is a culture of secrecy because names are routinely not made public. In other cases, where doctors have been named, they are able to call a halt to their own disciplinary case.’

Other than his time as a health minister and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Mr Barclay was previously chief secretary to the Treasury from February 2020 to September 2021, secretary for exiting the EU from November 2018 to January 2020 and economic secretary to the Treasury from June 2017 to January 2018.

He was educated at King Edward VII School in Lytham St. Annes Lancashire before reading history at Peterhouse, Cambridge. He later studied law at the College of Law, Chester. He worked as a solicitor before becoming a politician.


          

READERS' COMMENTS [11]

Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles

Iain Chalmers 6 July, 2022 10:44 am

Thanks Pulse for all the information.

Feel the medical profession have really “lucked out” here.

Chris GP 6 July, 2022 12:09 pm

Basically he is a live walking talking edition of the Daily Mail.
The comments around how he thinks accountability is so important and how there shouldn’t be any secrecy made me laugh though. Good one Stevie!
If I wasn’t going to jack it all in soon (retire VERY early) – I might give a sh1t.

Sam Macphie 6 July, 2022 2:04 pm

The buffoon PM and rickety ol’ cabinet situation seems to be the first recorded case case of ‘a sinking ship deserting the rat’.
So why is Barclay, (lots of money but trying to become as rich as a bank?) not deserting the ‘lacks integrity’ rat also.
Perhaps he too will sink in time.

Anke Lehmkuhl 6 July, 2022 2:29 pm

Here we go again, from the frying pan into the fire…
A populist, “shame doctors first and then investigate” lawyer as the new Health Secretary, and a chum of the PM to boot, what could possibly go wrong?

(Have they now finally found out who put that diamorphine 100 mg ampoule into Dr Ubani’s medical bag?
I thought so.)

Vinci Ho 6 July, 2022 3:37 pm

I am more interested in how long will he last ? Our fight simply goes on

Kevlar Cardie 6 July, 2022 6:32 pm

Who cares ?
He’ll p*** around, tinker at the edges then poke off in a few months.
Another self-serving eel in a suit.

Patrufini Duffy 7 July, 2022 9:32 pm

Should’ve just got an American or one of the secret service Harvard graduates in the DoH in, and we can all be done and dusted with the healthcare plans. Rule Britanniamerica..

Carpe Vinum 1 August, 2022 12:03 pm

According to sources quoted in the Health Service Journal, officials dreaded the idea of Barclay ever becoming health secretary because of his attitude and their clashes with him, mostly over health spending. In a damning editorial this week headlined “Steve Barclay is NHS leadership’s worst nightmare” the HSJ’s editor, Alastair McLellan, quotes insiders’ views.1

“A real nightmare, vindictive, arrogant, a bully, hostile to the NHS and all its works, a micro manager of the wrong things, views NHS management as bloated and profligate,” was one of them.

“Never has a politician arrived in the post . . . trailing a worse reputation among NHS leaders than Steve Barclay,” commented McLellan. “His ‘hard edged’ style rubbed people up the wrong way.”

“All the bombast and unfounded assumption of expertise of Hancock but without being a nice bloke,” was how one NHS leader summed him up.

Not the best start, perhaps.

Source: https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1687

David Turner 26 October, 2022 12:24 pm

Why do we fund the role of Health secretary?
None of them do anything useful and we would all be better off without their interfering.
The salary saved by getting rid of the role of health secretary could fund a few more nurses,

Kevlar Cardie 26 October, 2022 4:45 pm

Who REALLY gives a fig ?
What positive difference will he make to us or our patients ?
NONE.

Dave Haddock 26 October, 2022 6:44 pm

It’s the NHS that needs replacing, not the Health Secretary.