This site is intended for health professionals only


Newly approved Novavax Covid jab ‘should replace’ Pfizer and Moderna next winter

Newly approved Novavax Covid jab ‘should replace’ Pfizer and Moderna next winter

UK regulators have approved the Novavax Covid vaccine after a series of delays to the approval process.

In response to the announcement the former chair of the UK Vaccine Taskforce said its addition to future winter vaccine campaigns ‘could save the UK government a considerable amount of money’, and therefore ‘should’ replace currently-used vaccines.

The vaccine, developed in the US and also known as Nuvaxovid, is the fifth to be approved in the UK and is licensed as a two-dose schedule for over-18s.

It follows approval by European regulators in December. The vaccine differs from those currently in use in the UK in that it is based on recombinant protein-based technology, similar to that already in use in hepatitis B and other vaccines.

Other experts noted the more vaccine choices the better for future resiliency and for determining the most effective combination of jabs.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said it based its decision on data from two large clinical trials of almost 50,000 people, one of which was done in 15,000 volunteers in the UK and found an effectiveness of around 90%.

It has previously been announced that around 60 million doses of Novavax have been ordered by the UK Government with expected delivery in 2022.

In September, Novavax began early clinical trials of a combined Covid and flu vaccine in Australia.

Work is ongoing to determine efficacy against Omicron and the company said it would be ready to alter the vaccine strain if needed.

June Raine, MHRA chief executive, said: ‘Our approval of Nuvaxovid today follows a rigorous review of the safety, quality and effectiveness of this vaccine, and expert advice from the government’s independent scientific advisory body, the Commission on Human Medicines.

‘I am pleased to confirm today that this authorisation has been granted, providing access to a fifth vaccine that can be used to help protect us from Covid-19.

‘We are continuing our vital safety work in monitoring the use of all Covid-19 vaccines, to ensure that their benefits in protecting people against Covid-19 disease continue to outweigh any risks.

She added: ‘We also carry out independent batch testing on all the approved Covid-19 vaccines to ensure that every batch meets the expected quality standards.’

Dr Clive Dix, former chair of the UK Vaccine Taskforce, said: ‘This is excellent news as the clinical data on this vaccine is excellent and the strong cellular response should make this an excellent vaccine for boosting next winter.  

‘Not only do we expect a strong durable response but also good stability at fridge temperature so it can be rolled out with the flu vaccine next winter as part of the winter campaign.  

‘This should replace the need to buy more Pfizer and Moderna vaccine and save the UK government a considerable amount of money.’

Health and social care secretary Sajid Javid said the vaccine approval was testament to the ‘tens of thousands of people taking part in clinical trials here in the UK, contributing to the invaluable research that shows our vaccines are safe and effective’.

He added that the Joint Committee on Immunisation and Vaccination would now consider its use as part of the UK vaccination programme.

Professor Sir Munir Pirmohamed, chair of the Commission on Human Medicines, said they had carefully considered the available evidence on safety, quality and effectiveness.

‘We are pleased to say that we have advised that the benefit risk balance of Nuvaxovid is positive.’

Dr Peter English, retired consultant in communicable disease control and past chair of the BMA public health medicine committee, said he was not sure why the approval took so long as it had been known the vaccine was safe and effective for some time.

‘The more alternative vaccines there are, the better, both for resilience reasons (eg, if a problem arises with the manufacture of one or more brands), and because it allows us to see which vaccines, or combinations, are most effective in the short and long terms.’

READERS' COMMENTS [2]

David Church 3 February, 2022 10:07 pm

The term ‘recombinant’ is normally used for DNA technology, and does not apply to protein technology.
Has someone gotten confused?

Rogue 1 7 February, 2022 5:18 pm

That’s assuming of course that the science comes out with the conclusion that another booster is necessary.
But of course lets put the cart before the horse.