Streeting announces 43 neighbourhood pilots of which GPs will be ‘cornerstone’
The health secretary has announced the 43 areas which have been chosen to pilot the new neighbourhood health service – saying that GPs will be their ‘cornerstone’.
It comes after some areas have already appointed hospital trusts, rather than GPs, to lead neighbourhood services in their area.
Speaking today at a conference hosted by the King’s Fund, Wes Streeting said the ‘wave one’ sites will cover areas including more than a fifth of the population.
Backed by £10m in funding, they will begin on today (9 September) ‘with the ambition to scale up more services over the course of the next year’, the Government said.
According to the health secretary, these areas ‘are the ones best placed to provide immediate improvements to patients where the need is greatest’.
He said: ‘With GPs as the cornerstone, [the pilot areas] will act as test beds for the new financial flows and primary care contracts we described in the 10 year plan.
‘Starting in the most deprived parts of the country, vulnerable patients with multiple long-term conditions will get more joined-up services closer to home and avoid the frustration caused by a maze of referrals.’
Describing the services as a ‘big departure’ from previous health policy, the health secretary hailed the possibility that ‘that patients can see their GP and specialist consultants in the same building, often on the same day’.
The 43 pilot areas in full
- South and West Hertfordshire (Decorum and Hertsmere)
- North East Essex
- Ipswich and East Suffolk
- Barking and Dagenham
- Hillingdon
- Lambeth and Southwark
- Croydon
- Walsall
- Coventry
- Shropshire
- Leicestershire (West)
- Nottingham City
- North East Lincolnshire
- Stockton
- Rotherham
- Bradford and Craven (Bradford South, Keighley and Airedale)
- Sefton
- Rochdale
- Blackburn and Darwen
- East Berkshire and Slough
- Portsmouth
- East Kent
- East Surrey (Surrey Downs)
- Bristol (South Bristol)
- Cornwall and The Isles Of Scilly
- Dorset Place (Weymouth)
- West Essex
- West Suffolk
- Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster
- East Birmingham
- Solihull
- Herefordshire
- Sunderland
- Doncaster
- Wakefield
- Leeds (Hatch, South, East)
- St Helens
- Stockport
- Buckinghamshire (North, High Wycombe, Marlow Beaconsfield)
- East Sussex (Hastings and Rother)
- Woodspring
- Morecambe Bay
- Fenland, Peterborough and East, Peterborough
Also today, NHS England national medical director Dr Claire Fuller and DHSC second permanent secretary Tom Riordan wrote to the selected sites to confirm next steps.
The letter said: ‘We had an overwhelming response to the programme and received 141 applications (approximately 83% of the number of Places in England).
‘It has been encouraging to see so many good examples of neighbourhood working across the country and commitment to go further backed by senior leaders across health, care, the voluntary and community sector and their wider partners.’
It confirmed that the sites will be offered:
- Opportunity ‘to help shape enablers’ such as funding flows
- A ‘national coach’ to work with neighbourhood teams
- Access to ‘subject experts’
- Three face-to-face regional learning workshops
- Online support (practical tools, case studies and real-time learning)
- A ‘knowledge hub’ with themed areas for peer-to-peer learning (currently in development)
- Data and evaluation workshops to support baseline development and outcome tracking
- A ‘knowledge management centre’ to share and access insights from across the country
But GPs have raised concern about whether general practice will be leading on the new neighbourhood project.
BMA leaders are preparing to ‘debate the risk of the 10-year plan to the medical profession at large’ and whether the organisation should re-enter a formal dispute with the Government.
Last week, Pulse reported that South East London ICB has appointed a fifth trust, King’s College Hospital FT, has been chosen to lead the service in Bromley, meaning that five of its six areas will be led by trusts.
And Pulse revealed exclusively that GP leaders in one area advised practices to hold off from taking part in new ‘neighbourhood health programmes’, amid a lack of clarity and fears that these could jeopardise GMS contracts.
Related Articles
READERS' COMMENTS [12]
Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles


Good luck.
You’ll need it.
Can’t make a system more efficient than local Independent Contractor model, either Board led (think 2C) or Group Practice led (think non-coal face managerial Partners).
Whopping waste of money.
The headline should have read “Neoliberal Labour govt move Primary Care one step closer to an Americanised corporate healthcare system.
Well the advertised support package looks same old ,same old expert advice , webinars etc. I wonder how much of the supporting £10 million is available to the front line and whether this is recurrent funding or just pump priming. Lord Darzi said in his report , necessary to “hardwire” funding flows into primary and community care.
As is said , you can’t do owt with nowt and fine words ( (and webinars ) butter no parsnips
And lets see if they raise partners NIC contributions to help fund all this !
As a private GP, I am informed from a government document that I have the right to order NHS investigations and tests and refer into the NHS, so long as I don’t repeat any tests or request test an NHS doctor wouldn’t ask for. To be able to do this I need access to ICE. Sadly gaining access to ICE seems almost impossible and I’m not receiving any help from the ICB in South Yorkshire. Can anyone advise how to gain access to ICE do my patients can get the treatment they deserve. Here is a link to the governments paper. Of particular interest is section 8.2.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a74ccb340f0b61df4778971/patients-add-priv-care.pdf
As a private GP, I am informed from a government document that I have the right to order NHS investigations and tests and refer into the NHS, so long as I don’t repeat any tests or request test an NHS doctor wouldn’t ask for. To be able to do this I need access to ICE. Sadly gaining access to ICE seems almost impossible and I’m not receiving any help from the ICB in South Yorkshire. Can anyone advise how to gain access to ICE do my patients can get the treatment they deserve. Here is athe governments paper. Of particular interest is section 8.2. It’s called
Guidance on NHS patients who
wish to pay for additional
private care
In GP terms, the deckchairs on the Titanic will be mostly paying to reorganise themselves.
Wes says “GPs will be cornerstone” – hahaha, he means headstone, engraved “your family GP is closed for good.”
JOC that paper is for NHS patients seeking Consultant led private care and not for Private GP’s to cut costs referring patients into the NHS for investigations. Not surprised your local ICB isn’t helping. As a private GP, you would need to use a private lab for investigations
cornerstone and test bed for new contracts and financial flows sounds like NewSpeak to me
Thank goodness- nowhere I currently work in
Until you have a clear diagnosis, the treatment plan will remain unclear, or even a fudge.
As usual the “pilot” sites will have extra funding to pump prime the role out of how it should or could work. It tends to be the areas that always put their hands up for the extra funding. Sadly when the money runs out the system returns to the baseline. If they work then other practices are told they must do the same but without the funding. Pilotitis is the virus that kills innovation.