Independent GP model must be ‘central’ to neighbourhoods, LMCs demand
The independent contractor model should be ‘central’ to the delivery of general practice within the new neighbourhoods, GP leaders from around the UK have demanded.
On the last day of their conference in Belfast today, LMC representatives voted in favour of a motion demanding that any movement of work from secondary to primary care as part of neighbourhood structures is ‘appropriately’ funded to ensure stability for practices and ‘avoid deterioration to access for patients’.
Proposing the motion, Dr Conor Moore, from Southern Northern Ireland LMC, said: ‘We have already seen in England other organizations being invited into contract negotiations, and the suggestion that trusts could start to hold GP contracts.
‘For now, in Northern Ireland, new structures won’t be able to operate without independent contractors, but we need not forget that this includes pharmacy, optometry, dentistry, care homes, and social care providers. We will all be scrambling for funding.
‘We will see easier work cherry-picked, leaving general practice to manage frailty, complexity, and burgeoning multidisciplinary teams with the risks associated with this.
‘Given the levels of instability in general practice, it’s imperative that GPs and LMCs keep practices clearly informed. It’s essential that LMCs engage with other bodies, PCNs, ICBs, federations to ensure that the needs and practices are appropriately represented.’
Sefton LMC’s Dr David Smith, who supported the motion, said: ‘Neighbourhoods are about providing the right care in the right place at the right time, and while in some economies it may be possible too, practices should not be guilt tripped into signing up for schemes that provide no reward or improve financial security for themselves and their patients, propping up failing services elsewhere in the system.
‘Left shifting should be about transferring all the necessary resources, not sticking plasters over another problem.’
The conference also voted in favour of a motion opposing ‘workforce substitution models’ that ‘dilute’ GP expertise or transfer clinical risk without ‘appropriate’ safeguards.
LMC leaders insisted that GP supervision work is ‘formally recognised as non core’, requiring additional contractual time, funding and indemnity.
The BMA has previously said that in England PCNs should reject proposals to pilot single neighbourhoods if they lack ‘sufficient’ funding.
And NHS England said that new neighbourhood health centres planned by the Government will be expected to include ‘on-site general practice’ as a ‘core element’ of the model, not solely GP staff or sessional input.
The motions in full
NORTHERN IRELAND SOUTHERN: That conference believes that there is inherent risk in general practice engaging in proposed neighbourhood models of care and instructs GPC UK and the respective GPCs / LMCs to:
(i) ensure that the independent contractor model is kept central to the delivery of general practice
(ii) keep constituents close to discussions and informed at all stages of the process should they progress
(iii) ensure any movement of work from secondary to primary care is appropriately funded to ensure stability for practices and avoid deterioration to access for patients
(iv) engage with relevant bodies to ensure that the interests of members are protected and appropriately represented
(v) ensure that practising GPs are central in the development and leadership of new management structures.
CARRIED IN ALL PARTS
GLASGOW: That conference notes with concern that the widespread deployment of non-medical practitioners has created risks to patient safety and undermined the professional integrity of general practice, and calls on the BMA to:
(i) oppose workforce substitution models that dilute GP expertise or transfer clinical risk without appropriate safeguards
(ii) require that any further expansion of multi-disciplinary roles in general practice is contingent on nationally agreed scopes of practice, supervision requirements, indemnity cover and accountability frameworks
(iii) insist that GP supervision work is formally recognised as non core, requiring additional contractual time, funding and indemnity
(iv) affirm and defend GP-led models of care as essential to continuity, patient safety, and clinical leadership within general practice
CARRIED IN ALL PARTS

