This site is intended for health professionals only


Health service to face ‘difficult Christmas’ as five-day resident doctor strike to go ahead

Health service to face ‘difficult Christmas’ as five-day resident doctor strike to go ahead
Credit: Anna Colivicchi

Resident doctor strikes planned for this week will take place as planned, with providers warning of a ‘difficult Christmas’ as a result.

The five-day walkout will start at 7am on Wednesday 17 December and end at 7am on 22 December, after the BMA rejected the Government’s latest offer.

The last-ditch attempt to avert the strike saw an offer to quadruple specialty training posts and push through emergency legislation to prioritise UK medical graduates.

However, the BMA’s resident doctors committee said the offer does not create new jobs nor promise pay restoration.

The dispute concerns resident doctor pay, GP unemployment and a lack of specialty training places.

Last week, the Government offered to create 4,000 training posts over the next three years, rather than 1,000 as promised in the 10-year plan for the NHS – with the extra positions repurposed from ‘locally employed’ roles already present in the health service. 

It also proposed pushing through emergency legislation early next year that would ‘prioritise UK medical graduates’ for these specialty training roles. 

But the union has now confirmed that in a vote over the last few days, BMA resident doctor members voted by 83% to 17% to carry on with strike action.

RDC chair Dr Jack Fletcher said: ‘Tens of thousands of frontline doctors have come together to say “no” to what is clearly too little, too late.

‘There are no new jobs in this offer – [the health secretary] has simply cannibalised those jobs which already existed for the sake of “new” jobs on paper. Neither was there anything on what Mr Streeting has said is a journey to restoring our pay – that has clearly hit the buffers.’

However, he added that this week’s strike is ‘still entirely avoidable’ and that the health secretary should now work with the BMA to ‘come up with a credible offer’ to end the jobs crisis.

Dr Fletcher added: ‘We’re willing to work to find a solution if he is. We remain committed to ensuring patient safety, as we have done with all previous rounds of strike action, and urge hospital trusts to continue planning to ensure safe staffing.

‘We will be in close contact with NHS England throughout the strikes to address safety concerns if they arise.’

In response, health secretary Wes Streeting said that the strikes are ‘self-indulgent, irresponsible and dangerous’.

He added: ‘The Government’s offer would have halved competition for jobs and put more money in resident doctors’ pockets, but the BMA has again rejected it because it doesn’t meet their ask of a further 26% pay rise.

‘Resident doctors have already had a 28.9% pay rise – there is no justification for striking just because this fantasy demand has not been met.

‘I am appealing to ordinary resident doctors to go to work this week. There is a different magnitude of risk in striking at this moment. Abandoning your patients in their hour of greatest need goes against everything a career in medicine is meant to be about.’

Chief executive of NHS Providers Daniel Elkeles said the decision will ‘inevitably result in harm to patients and damage to the NHS’.

‘We had hoped that the Government’s recent updated offer would be enough to head off another walkout at a time when so many people are suffering with flu, and the NHS needs all hands on deck.

‘Trust leaders and staff will be working now to minimise the impact of the strike, but sadly it will mean further disruption and delays, and a very difficult Christmas for the health service.’

Commenting on the pre-Christmas strikes when they were first announced, NHS England chief executive Sir Jim Mackey had called them ‘reckless’, ‘calculated’, and a risk to patient safety.  

The vote results in full

“NO – I vote for December’s strike action to continue” – 29,215 votes (83.2%) 

“YES – I vote to call off December’s strike action” – 5,892 votes (16.8%) 

 

Number of eligible voters: 53,726 

Votes cast: 35,107 

Turnout: 65.34% 

 

Source: BMA


			

READERS' COMMENTS [6]

Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles

Guy Wilkinson 15 December, 2025 3:07 pm

The GPCE could learn a bit of how-to-union from the Resident Docs…….

Dave Haddock 15 December, 2025 3:22 pm

Sack the strikers, replace from the ranks of the unemployed.

Douglas Callow 15 December, 2025 3:39 pm

Numpty politicians, egged on by think-tanks, are beguiled by the sunny uplands of shorter bed-stays, improved technologies, virtual wards… all fine until winter comes. Wake up call for Streeting and co

Planning can mitigate pressure, but it can’t substitute for beds, staff and social care capacity that have been systematically stripped out.

Until that reality is acknowledged, winter will continue to arrive on schedule…

Centreground Centreground 15 December, 2025 6:23 pm

It is interesting that the  Resident Doctors form a more unified group than other sectors within the medical professions and  the ‘Tale of Two Cities’ seems  less apparent in this group..
The doctors fighting  for their  cause seem to have voted for the strike with some force but some disagreeing as would be expected . I would be interested to know what the backgrounds of those who have chosen not to strike are? Are they as per a previous pulse article (I believe), that discussed those entering medical school are still more likely to come from privileged backgrounds  and are the majority of the dissenters . Hence, those who state that they are not striking because of their moral position which must be true for some,  but for others that any pay rise would be trivial and hence it is easier to take this moral high ground position. There are of course other factors such as training places shortages etc.  but this  moral high ground taken by some fortunately  privileged doctors who have no real idea or understanding of differences in social background as exists  in various complex forms across all aspects of medicine as it does in society. General practice particularly inner city versus the county areas is a prime example of the have’s and have nots (whether inherited,  acquired or earned) and  is  alluded to by others in various forms within hospital and Primary care  but this divergence of backgrounds affecting major decisions such as strikes, policies, directions of travel is an interesting conflating factor in my opinion. It is an underlying but unmentioned factor in every aspect of healthcare in my opinion.

Not on your Nelly 15 December, 2025 10:27 pm

We neee to support our colleagues. It is the least we can do. The moral high ground will get you nothing because except other doctors, no one gives a flying monkeys about us.

So the bird flew away 15 December, 2025 11:05 pm

“Frankly beyond belief” that TBI puppets and purblind neoliberals Starmer, Reeves and Streeting haven’t been “sacked”.