This site is intended for health professionals only


GMC to update GMP with pledge to take context into account in FTP investigations


GMC to update GMP with pledge to take context into account in FTP investigations


The GMC has proposed a number of amendments to its Good Medical Practice guide, including a commitment to consider which ‘context’ a doctor was working in if a complaint arises.

The updates also include replacing existing doctor duties with 12 statements registrants should ‘commit’ to, such as being ‘open and honest when things go wrong’.

The GMC said that ‘if medical professionals apply the guidance, act in good faith and in the interests of patients, they’ll be in a good position to explain and justify their decisions and actions if a concern is raised about their practice’.

It also proposes to remove the ‘threshold’ statement for when it would launch a fitness-to-practise investigation, which currently says: ‘Only serious or persistent failure to follow this guidance will put your registration at risk.’

Instead, the GMC explains it will act ‘where there is a risk to patients or public confidence in medical professionals, or where it is necessary to maintain professional standards.’

The updated document also attempts to give ‘a fuller account’ of ‘factors considered by GMC decision-makers when they’re assessing risk’, including ‘the context in which the registrant was working in’, the GMC said.

The new draft of GMP says: ‘The professional standards describe good practice, not the thresholds at which medical professionals are safe to work.

‘When assessing the overall risk to public protection posed by a medical professional, through our fitness-to-practise process we consider the extent of their failure to meet the professional standards, factors that increase and decrease the risk to public protection (including the context in which they were working), and how they responded to the concerns raised.’

The proposed changes to GMP, which was last updated in 2013, are subject to a 12-week consultation, starting today.

The GMC said the proposed changes were the result of ‘months’ of working with GP and patient representatives and other stakeholders to bring the guidance up to date.

Launching the review last year, it had said ‘patients’ expectations and the way medical professionals deliver care has evolved’ since the last update of the GMP in 2013.

The GMC had also set out to see ‘if we can do more to address the inequalities and systematic issues that exist in medicine’.

This followed the high-profile case of Dr Hadiza Bawa-Garba, who has now been fully reinstated to practise medicine after the GMC took legal action to have her struck off – despite working amid overwhelming systemic pressures when a child died.

The proposed changes also include:

  • a new ‘zero tolerance’ policy for sexual harassment;
  • a duty for doctors to act if they become aware of workplace bullying; and
  • a new duty for doctors to make ‘reasonable checks’ that information they give out in all ‘written, spoken and digital communication’ is not ‘misleading’ (including via social media).

Urging GPs to respond to the consultation, GMC chief executive Charlie Massey said it is important that the guidance is ‘as relevant and realistic for doctors working in primary care as for those employed elsewhere’.

He said: ‘For that reason, we really want to hear from GPs as part of our consultation. 

‘We know that GPs continue to face huge workload pressures and we want our guidance to provide a helpful framework to navigate professional and ethical challenges, without creating any additional burdens.’

GP indemnity provider the MDU said it would ‘scrutinise’ the proposed changes before responding to the consultation.

Good Medical Practice is at the core of everything the GMC does – setting the professional behaviours and care standards it expects of all doctors practising in the UK,’ MDU director of medical services Dr Caroline Fryar said.

‘It is one of the central tools used by the GMC in its fitness-to-practise processes, so every paragraph and every single word in the guidance document matters.’

Dr Fryar noted that the consultation ‘is proposing significant changes whilst also making a number of additions’, adding that ‘regulations, sets of rules and guidance documents must be compatible with the realities of doctors’ daily working lives, and support them to get on with the job of safely caring for patients’.

‘The MDU will scrutinise this proposed revision of the guidance very carefully,’ she added.

In January, the GMC updated its temporary pandemic guidance to take into account ‘sustained fatigue’ experienced by GPs when assessing fitness-to-practise complaints.

Last year, doctors requested clarity after the GMC said criticising the Covid vaccine or other pandemic measures via social platforms could leave them ‘vulnerable’ to investigation.

The GMC also warned last year that GPs are the most likely to be at a high risk of burnout compared with other doctors.

Revised ‘commitments’ of GMC-registered professionals

As a medical professional I will:

  1. Make the care of patients my first concern.
  2. Work effectively with colleagues in ways that best serve the interests of patients.
  3. Act promptly if I think the safety, dignity or comfort of patients or colleagues are being compromised.
  4. Treat patients as individuals and respect their dignity and privacy.
  5. Listen to, support and work in partnership with patients, to help them to make informed decisions about their care.
  6. Provide a good standard of practice and care, and be honest and open when things go wrong.
  7. Work within my competence and keep my knowledge and skills up to date.
  8. Demonstrate leadership as appropriate to my role, and work with others to make healthcare more supportive, inclusive and fair.
  9. Protect and promote the health of patients and the public. 
  10. Act with honesty and integrity.
  11. Never discriminate unfairly against patients or colleagues.
  12. Make sure my conduct justifies my patients’ trust in me and the public’s trust in my profession.

Source: Draft updated Good Medical Practice guide

READERS' COMMENTS [7]

David jenkins 27 April, 2022 3:02 pm

two words should be on the tip of your tongue if the GMC asks for anything:

bawa garba

Patrufini Duffy 27 April, 2022 3:25 pm

Considering
Consulting
Thinking
Proposing
Meeting

Sums it up – same old ideology. Same old nothing. Out of touch with humanity and reality.

Iain Chalmers 27 April, 2022 5:32 pm

Believe it when I see it.

Don’t think latest incarnation of Taliban is much different to old Taliban.

An ill Dr isn’t always a bad Dr but no differentiation in the 2 cohorts IMHO

Turn out The Lights 27 April, 2022 9:34 pm

We have long memories Charlie Massey still hasn’t done the honourable thing,anther establishment goon who apologises and accepts responsibility like Boris.

Patrufini Duffy 27 April, 2022 11:17 pm

Lights on. Charlie Massey “is a career civil servant, having previously worked in HM Treasury, the Cabinet Office, Department for Work and Pensions, the Pensions Regulator and the Department of Social Security”. Useful.

Kevlar Cardie 6 May, 2022 12:35 pm

The nicer, kinder, gentler Stasi.

S. Ali 11 May, 2022 10:02 pm

We have a bunch of paper-pushers without medical qualifications changing Good Medical Practice. What can go wrong?
It seems people are struggling to understand that a Bad Medical Council ‘already ignores’ the previous threshold and what this new guidelines does is enshrines not only the rights of the GMC to police the professional and private lives of doctors but also proposes that the GMC becomes a doctors omnipotent religion/god in particular with ‘…and how they responded to the concerns raised’
Paragraph 65 is already the most heavily used paragraph for FTP (new paragraph 70) reducing the threshold to everything for a non-government/private company where it is clear they already misuse their power to appeal only to be evil rather than fair unlike the PSA. You can see the GMC will not be able to help themselves as they will continue to increase non-medical investigations https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/non_medical_gmc_ftp_investigatio

The GMC has already almost doubled its workforce of non-medics which is the majority of its staff. It will only be a matter of time before Revalidation department gets into the FTP referral process to increase the number of investigations. The GMC in their multiplying glass and ivory towers only seem to abuse the powers given to them but they will do everything possible to make sure GMP is not applied to their own staff. GMC hypocrisy.