This site is intended for health professionals only


Practices losing 200k appointments each week due to GP online access changes

Practices losing 200k appointments each week due to GP online access changes
via Getty Images

Exclusive GP practices are spending time equivalent to more than 200,000 appointments a week implementing new online access changes, which is increasing waiting times for patients and working hours for staff as a result.

GPs and practice managers have said that recent contractual changes have forced some practices to cancel appointments to protect time to go through the requests, while some have had to extend staff hours, a Pulse and Management in Practice survey has revealed.

This is a direct result of changes brought in on 1 October that require practices to ensure online requests can be submitted between 8am to 6.30pm.

Last week, Pulse reported that GPs were warning the new requirements risk compromising patient safety, with patients reporting breathing difficulties, severe vomiting, acute abdominal and chest pain, and rectal bleeding through online forms.

The survey of 431 GPs and practice managers – encompassing 412 practices – found the average GP is spending around 53 minutes per week on implementing the changes, while non-GP clinical staff spent 42 minutes on average and admin staff 31 minutes. 

Projected out to the entire full time equivalent (FTE) GP workforce in England (38,860), this equates to over 34,000 GP hours each week, or 209,442 10-minute appointment slots.

The BMA has formally entered a dispute with the Government over the changes, warning that many practices would struggle to implement the changes safely and would have to introduce waiting lists.

In all, 93% of survey respondents said their practice had implemented the changes – up from 60% before 1 October – with 47% seeing waiting times increase as a result. Just over a third (36%) said they were able to clear all late online requests on the day. 

Common measures for dealing with the changes reported by GPs included blocking appointments to create space for triaging (58%) and extending staff hours (43%).  

And 77% of GPs said their practice would continue to close for half-day training, with only 4% reporting they had stopped them because of the contract changes.

A GP in Cambridgeshire said the changes have made their practice ‘feel even more like a production line’. 

They said: ‘The GP day, which was previously already “full on” – grabbing lunch, difficult to find time even to eat, debrief registrars or go to the toilet – has now become even more relentless.  

‘How sad to feel even more like a production line. Quality general practice needs time to pause, evaluate, reflect, contact patients about abnormal results, check in on cancer or palliative patients. 

‘With all inputs on, all of the time in the day, the quality of care in other areas will reduce as we can’t fight fires and plan holistic medical care for vulnerable patients simultaneously.’ 

One Merseyside GP said they both partners at their surgery are now working very long hours to prevent next-day backlogs building up. They said: ‘I stay in the surgery until I can’t think any more, some days that’s been 10 or 11pm’. 

Online access before and after 1 October and how practices are coping

Pre-1 October, did you have the online access available continuously during routine hours every day?
Yes: 60%
No: 40%

Total answered: 404

Since 1 October, have you had online access available continuously during routine hours every day:
Yes: 93%
No: 7%

Total answered: 401

Have you had to do any of the following as a result of the contractual changes?

Increase routine waiting times – 47% (Total answered: 352)

Block appointment to create space for triaging – 58% (Total answered: 384)

Extend staff hours – 43% (Total answered: 377)

Hire additional non-clinical staff – 16% (Total answered: 359)

 

Source: Pulse and Management in Practice survey

Many GPs reported significant cutbacks in the number of available appointments and GP sessions due to implementation requirements. 

Surrey GP partner Dr Dave Triska said his practice has seen an approximate 15% increase in online submissions since 1 October, despite his practice continuing to turn off the tool in the middle of the day to protect time for receptionists to phone patients.  

Dr Triska said the increase in expectations of immediate access is like ‘trying to fit a pint into a thimble’ given the realities of GP practice capacity to deal with requests. 

He said: ‘The current mitigation in a system that is sensible is that you absolutely have a human review for this, a clinician review, ideally, because at least then you can do that with the voice of experience rapidly.

‘But the operational problem is that you physically can’t do that in practice, from 8am until 6.30pm in the evening without significant denigration of services, or indeed the person providing that service.’  

Another GP said: ‘We previously had phone lines off between 12.30 and 2pm (emergency line open) to allow reception staff to crack on with referrals and prescriptions.  

‘Having them turned on has been terrible and staff are burning out already as (there is) no time to do the admin work. We are a small surgery with limited space.’

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: ‘This data only represents a very small percentage of GP practices. Patients want this service, with more people now contacting their GP online than by phone, and we gave practices six month notice to prepare for the rollout.

‘We are grateful to the majority of practices are already delivering this service successfully – to the benefit of patients and their care – and we are supporting others to increase compliance.

‘To support GPs, we have also provided an extra £1.1 billion of vital funding and have recruited 2,500 more GPs.’

Methodology

This survey was open between 18 and 24 October 2025, collating responses using the SurveyMonkey tool. The survey was advertised to readers of Pulse and Management in Practice via our website and email newsletter, with a prize draw for a £250 voucher as an incentive to complete the survey. The survey was unweighted, and we do not claim this to be scientific – only a snapshot of the GP and practice manager population.

Respondents were asked to input their practice code, their practice name and their post code. Where this wasn’t clear, we correlated this information with data from NHS England (epraccur document). Where this still wasn’t clear, we searched practice websites. All those without the required information after this research were removed.

 For duplicate practice codes – more than one respondent from a single practice – we remove duplicates in the following order:

  • Those who provided fuller information (ie, fewer blank answers and ‘don’t knows’) were prioritised;
  • After this, GP partners were prioritised over practice managers;
  • After this, those who answered first were prioritised.

 This left a remaining 412 respondents, represented by 300 GPs and 112 practice managers.

 To work out the time spent per average GP and other staff members, we worked out total staff numbers in the responding practices through correlating their practice codes with NHS Digital data. We then applied a midpoint analysis to work out an average. The figure of 38,860 was from NHS Digital.


			

READERS' COMMENTS [4]

Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles

DR I LLEWELLYN 5 November, 2025 8:03 pm

I can see how this can cause more time

Doctor Doom. 8 November, 2025 10:55 am

Why isn’t this in the national news?

Merlin Wyltt 12 November, 2025 1:47 pm

GPs need to stop being so subservient. I have always taken the view that we should do our best for our patients. Ploughing through 50 online queries at 6.30 pm after a full days work is not helpful to the clinician or the patient. We have a duty to protect patient health and clinician well being. Don’t do it. Many GP surgeries are not doing it. Show a bit of resistance.

Chun Kit Poh 19 November, 2025 6:22 pm

It’s not a simple as just ‘don’t do it’. Your comment did not show due consideration that acting through requests, even if they come in at 18:29, is CONTRACTUAL and the providers’ duty of care to sieve through them, as the GP partners are medicolegally responsible. The problem is the ‘free for all buffet’ has taken GPs away from seeing patients face to face, to triaging a barrage and mixture of urgent requests buried amongst the trivia of e.g. can I take tumeric with my condition. The only way that GPs ‘DON’T DO IT’, is through industrial action that is properly balloted to be fully, legally protected.