This site is intended for health professionals only


Obsessing over cancer is less than charitable

Obsessing over cancer is less than charitable

Copperfield on how political and charitable preoccupation over cancer eats into valuable NHS resources and time

Did anyone pick up the whiff of irony emanating from the recent ‘thousands overtreated for prostate cancer’ story?

This stemmed from Prostate Cancer UK highlighting that men are having unnecessary treatment when they should be managed with surveillance. Hang on, though. Many of these men probably wouldn’t be in the urology system at all had it not been for years of various charities banging drums and thereby stoking up prostatophobia and indiscriminate testing – turning general practice into a satellite urology clinic for unfunded PSA monitoring.

Well, now it’s going to get even worse, and not just with prostate cancer: charities are doubling down, and the DHSC’s response fills me with dread. Because – according to One Cancer Voice, a cancer charity coalition – there will be ‘one cancer diagnosis every ten minutes within the next 15 years’. Cue a six-point plan including, inevitably, new earlier diagnosis targets and improved screening. And a response from the Government suggesting that the forthcoming new national cancer plan will include more tests, checks, scans and DIY screening kits.

The problem with obsessional checking, scanning and monitoring is: seek and ye shall find. Occasionally, this helps the patient. But very often it doesn’t. Finding a cancer ‘early’ only helps if it improves the prognosis. It may not, in which case the illusion of prolonged survival translates into a reality of knowing you’ve got cancer for longer, and dying when you would have done anyway. Thanks for that.

Plus, as any GP who has ploughed through countless letters a day asking us to ‘kindly follow up’ this adrenal swelling, that ovarian cyst and the other lung nodule knows: every body is a Pandora’s box and a scan lifts the lid. Hence any spare time around our primary care PSA monitoring service is spent in our new, also unfunded, incidentaloma clinics.

All of which prolongs outpatient waits, lengthens investigation delays for those in real need, and creates workload for us and stress for patients. In obsessing over cancer, with all its political and charitable baggage, we create a monster that eats the rest of the NHS.

Not that I expect One Cancer Voice to stop shouting about it until they’re hoarse. Actually, they should get that checked.

Dr Copperfield is a GP in Essex. Read more of his blogs here


			

Have you got a view you want to share with Pulse?

We’re always open to first-hand pieces and opinions from GPs.
Email your piece for consideration to be published on our site.

READERS' COMMENTS [8]

Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles

So the bird flew away 27 August, 2025 6:17 pm

Had a patient the other day grumbling he’d given up sleeping face down – because he didn’t want to catch prostrate cancer….

David Church 27 August, 2025 8:13 pm

It would be possible to considerably reduce the number of cancer diagnoses quite easily by reducing the number of patients, which will probably be achieved in 2 ways –
firstly, we can send lots of young patients off to war, if we stir up enough hatred in the middle east and eastern europe;
secondly, just reduce funding to GPs, so that more practices close, and those patients will be eliminated.

Tj Motown 27 August, 2025 9:19 pm

As my patient who was taking 15 tablets and then got hit by a bus and then stopped all his tablets said to me:
“What’s the point? You’d do all those checks just for me to walk out the door and get hit by a bus”

christine harvey 28 August, 2025 5:21 am

Cancer appears to be the special disease – try having heart failure or epilepsy and no-one gives two hoots.

Paul Loxton 28 August, 2025 7:01 am

Well said Copperfield.
The Prostate Cancer Charity and The Daily Telegraph should be ashamed of themselves.

So the bird flew away 28 August, 2025 10:13 am

PL, both of them probably been financially incentivised by the Cancer industrial complex….
Over the last week, The Daily Polygraph (aka Redbird Capital) has been whipping up prostate cancer screening and scare stories.
#privatesectorpressure.financialincentive.upcoding.overdiagnosis.

Marina Dalziel 28 August, 2025 1:00 pm

I was told in my medical school years ago that there are no absolutely healthy people, some are simply under-investigated….

Dave Haddock 1 September, 2025 7:52 pm

DT currently running an ill-informed campaign to introduce formal prostate screening; the small print, in those at high risk, seems to have been missed by casual readers.
Fortunately not widely read among the local demographic.