‘What private general practice taught me – and why I’m glad they sacked me’
Following a short spell working as a GP in the private sector, Dr Jonny Currie warns of the commercial pressures threatening general practice that could tip the NHS toward a profit-driven system
Something amusing happened towards the end of last year. Well, I say amusing, but being made redundant (even if it was from a private medical side-job) is not really in the least bit funny.
Let me start at the beginning. My main job is working as a GP in east Newport, where three in four of our patients live in the poorest part of what is already a poorer nation than across the border in England. A few months ago, I decided to pursue a part-time job in the private healthcare sector, alongside my NHS GP role. Yes – I can already detect your raised eyebrows, because yes, I have had them all before. To be honest, I count it as a good thing because it shows the measure of the people I hang out with.
But I have never been able to let go of the idea that we all ought to walk in each other’s shoes more. Having seen the perils of private healthcare overseas – the profit ethos, the inefficiencies of a two-tiered system, the rampant inequalities it can drive – as well as at home (I temped as a Harley Street clinic secretary during a gap year years ago), I had already formed a firm view of the sector. But an older, wiser me knew I could explore it further. And so, I adopted the role of remote private clinician, braving the new and mercantile world of corporate health.
Despite my concerns about private medicine, I did find it taught me a thing or two. I noticed different approaches to safeguarding, mandatory training (I can’t be the only one to admit that we can be a bit lax on that in the NHS), incident reporting, patient feedback, and audit. I must admit that I felt uncomfortable with the level of scrutiny on me; not so much by patients whose feedback was collated and sent to us regularly, but by the idea that my notes would be frequently audited. And this is coming from someone who feels scrutiny and transparency can only be positive.
But it was here that the deeper problem became clear to me. Commercial healthcare wants our NHS. It wants our staff. And it obviously wants our patients. To do this, it is pricing and innovating (a lot more than we in the NHS are) to secure an increasing market share, driven by the idea that many are dissatisfied with the status quo of the NHS.
The difficulty is that this growth is not built around continuity or integration. As a remote private GP, I had no access to your NHS universal healthcare record. I can’t speak freely to local clinicians in the community or hospital about your care. I can’t book you bloods or investigations the same day. I only know what medication you need or are asking for if I can see what you had last time or are on now.
I can’t get advice from an expert in your condition digitally and continue to lead your care. I can’t see you. I can only pass you on to someone who can, which invariably in commercial healthcare is not another GP, but a specialist. And to me, this undermines the core strength of the NHS: GP-led continuity of care, carried out by community medicine experts, coordinating the cacophonous orchestra that is fragmented care, fragmented across conditions, specialties and agencies.
In the world of commercial healthcare, GPs are cannon fodder. It is our expert colleagues in surgery, specialist medicine, technology and others who will drive up profits, not us. And so, I am fortunate, unlike my patients whose job loss too often wounds or scars, to be there no longer, as I have learned enough. Corporate and mercantile healthcare is here to stay.
But for GPs, participation should come with open eyes. In this world, general practice is not the prize: it is simply the conduit. Profits are driven by specialist activity and throughput. Continuity, coordination and community knowledge – the very things that once made the NHS work – are being gradually eroded.
As I said at the beginning, I was made redundant from the private job (which rather proved the point I was in the process of learning!) And, acknowledging that I will differ from colleagues whose redundancies will hurt, I was somewhat glad it came to an end. I really don’t know how much longer I could have kept up the role: moonlighting as a quasi-anthropologist of commercial healthcare or not.
We obviously do need more innovation, goods production, and marketing (less of the pharmaceutical kind, thank you very much) in the NHS. But private healthcare does not grow alongside a universal, comprehensive and fair health system. Rather, it grows in its absence, filling gaps created by delay, fragmentation and dissatisfaction – and in doing so, risks widening them.
Before deciding whether you agree with this sentiment, don’t just think about America as the obvious example. Think instead about the UK before Wales donated England and the rest of the country (yes, we did, you’re welcome) the NHS in 1948. Care was fragmented and transactional – and it really isn’t that long ago in our history.
I learned these lessons and, redundancy aside, I had the luxury of stepping away with my eyes open. Many of our patients will not be so fortunate, nor clinicians. If we are not careful, private healthcare will not merely sit alongside the NHS; it will hollow it out. We GPs need to summon our inner Nye Bevan and ask what kind of world and health system we want our grandchildren to inherit. Raise an eyebrow at that, please.
Dr Jonny Currie is a GP partner, public health consultant and clinical research fellow at Cardiff University. He is also the co-director at 19 Hills CIC, a social enterprise promoting integrated and holistic community health and wellbeing activities.
Have you got a view you want to share with Pulse?
We’re always open to first-hand pieces and opinions from GPs.
Email your piece for consideration to be published on our site.
Related Articles
READERS' COMMENTS [14]
Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles


Excellent article – yes you are absolutely right. Thank you Jonny
Recently when I was looking for GP jobs, I came across a post , private GP, ideal remote work, to work certain number of days etc. It had no direct patient contact but mainly going through their results ( which someone else ordered) and writing a report about them, writing reports for insurance etc. I thought hard and decided not to go ahead with this. Reason 1, no patient contact in the long run would kill my clinical and consultation skills. Reason 2, they would probably hire GPs to do this ‘cannon fodder’ type work for maybe two years, gather data from their work, feed it into a system and apply AI, guess what? an automated system will do this work after two years and no GPs would be needed. I refused but there will be other GPs who might agree to do this work!
The difference between NHS and private is one treats as best as possible every encounter, the other looks to profit from every patient encounter-that is why the NHS is so precious. We must not let those who criticise our NHS to pretend they have a better alternative-ask your patient with cancer or chronic illness or MI how they would manage privately/ insurance/ fees etc
An advantage in Australia is that you can bill privately, I did so offering an out or hours service and still patients access what I did on their NHS.
I had access to My Health Records which has more than our spine:, path results xrays hospital and GP entries. Scripts and tests remain NHS funded. The UK complete separation is of prvate and NHS is bad for patirnt care.
Breaking Bad.
Jonny,do you eator sleep?Are youGeorge Osborne in disguise? Can you please write an article about how you had 4 jobs and kept your sanity?
@shaun Meehan, – you are very wrong about the difference you quoted between the NHS & Private GP system. Both are driven on profits and not just the private, NHS GP is not a charity work, we get paid in core funding, DES / LES / PCN level funding etc. If a work is not funded, it will not get done. Everything gets paid for including the rent of the Surgery premises, which is not the case in private sector. So before we bash our private GP colleagues / system, let’s take a break and reflect on our views about this. NHS is no better. It’s poorly funded and not easily accessible for patients. There are numerous flaws in the system. Yes, it may be good when it comes to critical / cancer care, but people need more than that, and if they can afford to get it privately, I don’t see any harm in it. NHS and private sectors can thrive side by side for the benefit of all. P.s: I am an NHS GP.
This is a great article and I agree with every word (did some private GP work myself many moons ago – never liked it for all the reasons you state).
Bizarre article.
GP has been in Private hands since forever.
The Profit motive is a major reason why we go to work.
Most of the Developed World uses Private Providers in healthcare to a greater or lesser extent, and generally with better outcomes than the NHS, and without the long waiting lists that characterise the NHS.
The World is bigger than the NHS and “America”; perhaps have a look at Australia, Taiwan, S Korea, Japan?
Shaun – quite right. If you want a corollary, try taking your dog to a corporate vet.
Er – yes and no. Profit in NHS GP land is not much to do with activity – there is some but at least it’s evidence based. Also our profit is necessary because nobody pays us a salary. In the private sector there is a drive to produce profit for corporate reasons – ie shareholders. As i mentioned in another contribution – take your dog to a corporate vet and you’ll see how they maximize profit without any tangible improvement in the pet’s health.
At least GP activity is evidence based. Another good example is the way that everyone you refer to gastroenterology gets an endoscopy of a sort whatever the indication.
Corporate private general practice is a very different beast compared with independent private general practice.
Definitely not George Osborne! The rest I’ll take as a compliment 🙂