‘Deprioritising IMGs is a policy the Government will regret’
Dr Margaret Ikpoh argues that deprioritising international medical graduates for foundation and specialty training may ease short-term pressure, but will not prevent the next GP workforce crisis
I give it five years – maybe less – before the Government decides to ‘take a moment to reflect’. This familiar ritual is usually triggered not by foresight, but retrospectively by another workforce crisis. When it comes, the reflection will focus on the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill and its most efficient outcome, which has been the systematic deprioritisation of International Medical Graduates (IMGs). You may know them as the very doctors who have quietly sustained general practice for decades.
This policy has been framed as strategic. UK medical school places were expanded (rightly so) and it is only correct that we ensure jobs and training opportunities for our home-grown graduates.
But expanding undergraduate numbers without a matching increase in training posts or specialty capacity does not solve a workforce problem; it simply displaces it. This resulting bottleneck in which we find ourselves was entirely predictable to the point where it could have been sketched during my coffee break between meetings. We created competition without capacity, which in turn has led to scarcity without strategy.
Throughout this, IMGs have remained faithful to a system that repeatedly failed them. They navigated PLAB costs, visa hurdles, disproportionate referrals to regulators, prolonged uncertainty, and delay. Many have settled permanently and gained indefinite leave to remain (ILR). Nearly all of them continued to staff rota gaps, underserved areas, and overstretched practices until they were quietly deprioritised in the name of workforce planning.
As an IMG, I recognise the uncomfortable truth that under today’s rules, I might never have become a GP in the UK. Not for lack of my ability or commitment; but because the door that I entered through, narrow as it was, is now closing. This is not workforce planning, it is retrospective exclusion and will not fix a GP workforce in which over half trained overseas.
General practice does not suffer from a supply problem alone, but from poor retention, limited progression, low morale, and the ongoing absence of a credible workforce plan. Prioritising one group of doctors without addressing these fundamentals does not stabilise the workforce; it merely reshuffles who is disappointed first.
In that context, the more likely future looks like this: by 2030, many more newly-qualified GPs – including those the system has worked so hard to prioritise – will have left the UK. They will be actively recruited by healthcare systems offering clarity and opportunity. The UK will have succeeded, not in retaining its doctors, but in training them for export
And so, the cycle continues. A crisis, followed by reflection, followed by regret. When the next workforce emergency arrives, the call will return: Please come back. Once again, it will be addressed to IMGs, faithful still, perhaps, but understandably hesitant this time.
Dr Margaret Ikpoh is a GP in Holderness, East Yorkshire. You can find her on X @docmagsy
Have you got a view you want to share with Pulse?
We’re always open to first-hand pieces and opinions from GPs.
Email your piece for consideration to be published on our site.
Related Articles
READERS' COMMENTS [3]
Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles


I don’t see that there was much choice when recent changes were leading to such extensive unemployment after F2 – it simply doesn’t make sense to have all the locally, expensively trained doctors being unable to access further training because the gates had been flung open.
Perhaps we could try to make general practice less of a job that’s impossible to do, to help stop people leaving?
Now there’s a (wistful) thought.
Good article, Margaret, but I’d call this Govt out – in the red tops this Bill will play out as IMGs “to blame for taking our young GPs jobs”. When it’s successive Govts themselves that have caused this situation by gross understaffing, fragmentation, exorbitant manufactured demand and severe underfunding. They’ve been bending the knee to our US sovereign and the corporate Barons. Introducing this bill, at this moment in time, is just craven pandering to the nativism of Tommy Yaxley-Wetpants types.
We have one of the lowest GP per capita ratios in the OECD. Instead of spending (or not earning) £tens of billions on tax breaks and evasions, Bailouts, grants and subsidies, Usury vehicles, lost incomes on financial transaction taxes especially complex debt vehicles, Havens, unorthodox capital flows etc for Elites – – all we need to do is to have the political will to reallocate some of those £billions to funding appropriate GP numbers etc.
So, I’m ready to stick The Clash on the deck, pin on my RAR badge and boot this Govt into a future historical footnote.
Inn 2009 labour Govt. Was puttingna stamp on HSMP and visas “not for training” . IMGs were not allowed to apply in round one. IMGs shoild be told about thrse changes when they apply for plab and it should advertised so they kn9q what yhey are getting in to.