Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

New anticoagulant 'is cost effective for AF treatment', study shows

By Lilian Anekwe

Evidence is emerging that a new generation of oral anticoagulants could be cost-effective alternatives to warfarin for atrial fibrillation.

A US modelling study based on UK prices of dabigatran – an oral direct thrombin inhibitor – found that although the higher doses of the drug fell just outside the NICE cost-effectiveness threshold, lower doses fell within the £30,000 per year cut-off.

The study, published in the latest issue of Annals of Internal Medicine, used a model comparing the use of clinic-adjusted warfarin to a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 with twice-daily 110mg and twice-daily 150mg dabigatran.

The drug is currently licensed in the UK for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after surgery.

Professor David Fitzmaurice, professor of primary care research at the University of Birmingham and anticoagulation lead for the Primary Care Cardiovascular Society, said: ‘Dabigatran is the first major advance in oral anticoagulation for over 60 years. More robust data on costs and effects are needed before excluding any particular dose based on an economic model.'

Dabigatran at lower doses is cost effective compared to warfarin

Rate this article  (5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say