This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

Practice closing 'due to delayed paperwork' after death of single-hander

A London surgery is set to shut its doors for good following the death of its sole GP after commissioners failed to sort out paperwork to transfer ownership. 

Myddleton Road Surgery, which serves around 3,100 patients, will close in November after delays to commissioners sending a new contract before the practice's single-handed GP passed away. 

Dr Dineshwar Prasad died of cancer on 28 June, only eight days before a new GP partner was meant to take over the contract. 

NHS Haringey CCG said it had no choice in the decision, first reported in the Enfield Independent, to terminate the contract as it was 'a legal stipulation in line with national primary care regulations'.

Prior to Dr Prasad's death, Myddleton Road Surgery had plans to merge with two other practices, which would have resulted in the practice relocating to a new building alongside the need for a new GP.

The CCG's primary care committee held a meeting on 20 June where it approved an application received to add one GP and a non-clinical partner to the practice. 

However, Dr Prasad passed away before he could sign the changes made to the new contract, making it therefore invalid.  

This was because commissioners failed to get the contract signed by Dr Prasad before he passed away, Pulse understands. 

NHS Haringey CCG said: 'In the months leading up to Dr Prasad’s death, NHS Haringey CCG had been discussing and supporting the practice’s plans to merge with two other practices and to relocate to a new fit for purpose building. This would have led to the eventual closure of the Myddleton Road Surgery site. As part of the preparations for this merger, Myddleton Road Surgery was looking for a clinical partner to replace Dr Prasad.'

It added that it received an application to add a GP, which was approved on 20 June. 

'Following the committee’s decision on 20 June, the next stage in the process is to make the relevant amendments to the contract and get it signed by the contract holder (Dr Prasad). Very sadly, Dr Prasad passed away eight days later on 28 June before this stage of the process could be completed.'

According to NHS England's GMS contract documents, if a sole practitioner dies, the practice's contract automatically comes to an end 'at the end of the period of seven days beginning with the date of the contractor's death'.

NHS Haringey CCG said: 'Dr Prasad was the sole contract holder at Myddleton Road Surgery, which meant that the contract automatically terminated following his death. The termination of a contract in this circumstance is a legal stipulation in line with national primary care regulations; it was not a decision that the CCG made or could influence. 

'The CCG then had to make a decision about whether to undertake a full procurement process to issue a new contract. We decided not to do this in light of the inadequacy of the surgery’s premises, the relatively small number of patients registered with the practice and the high number of other GP practices near to Myddleton Road (there are 10 practices within one mile and 40 within two miles).'

A GP practising in the area, who wished to remain anonymous, told Pulse they believe commissioners could have better handled the case to prevent the practice from closing. 

They said: 'The whole thing was very badly managed... Dr Prasad was the single handed owner of the practice and he got cancer.'

The GP added that there was a contract ready with a GP's name on it - but that GP had turned down the chance to take over the practice. But there was no signed contract with the GP who was willing to take over

'On Friday night, 28 June, Dr Prasad died. Monday morning, 1 July, the GP was there ready to take over but NHS England said they cannot have the practice because the contract dies with the doctor.

'That's legally right but morally what’s crazy is that there was a doctor ready to take over the surgery to look after 3,000 patients. Now those patients don’t have a doctor and have to be dispersed.'

NHS Haringey CCG said: 'We recognise that the timing is deeply unfortunate, and our thoughts are particularly with the Prasad family at this time.'

The CCG said it has appointed Federated4Health, a GP-run organisation, on a 'caretaking' contract to provide services until the surgery closes. 

Please note - this story originally said there were delays from NHS England in signing the contract. However, NHS England confirmed that the CCG has delegated responsibility for the contract

Readers' comments (13)

  • IT IS IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT DOCTORS PERSONAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING MEANS NOTHING TO THE NHS.
    WE ARE TREATED AS "SCUM" RATHER LIKE CANNON FODDER OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR.
    THIS "DISGRACEFUL" BEHAVIOUR IS PEDDLED BY "THE DAILY NUTTER", THE PROPANGANDA TOOL OF THE TORY MACHINE.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lack of respect, time to pay a penance UK population.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Small general practice will be crushed. It has been decided. It’s time we recognised this and tipped the last drops of goodwill in the poison chalice down the drain. Tragic.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The article focusses more on the practice closing and the consequences of it rather than on the sad and untimely lone fighter who kept that striken boat aflot for so many years- TYPICAL HEALTH JOURNALISM. RIP Dr Prasad and the NHS too with you

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is all about patients supposedly and closing the practice really helps them. There is no care or concern for the lone GP. It really shows in the current work and be poorer NHS pension fiasco. Only in Britain.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Looks like negligent handling by CCG/NHS.
    If they can give a temporary contract to a private company, then they equally well can give one to the GP who was there ready to take over.
    They just did not want to. I wonder why?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Took Early Retirement

    How sad.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Very negligent behavior from NHSE. They seemingly lied to the new GP that it was going ahead.
    Contract had already been prepared a few months earlier and they only needed to change a name as it had been already approved. There was a bigger plan here. power ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Very poorly managed by CCG
    There was a GP ready to take over.
    What about Dr Prasad's efforts.
    What about upheaval to patients being allocated to unfamiliar group practices

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just Your Average Joe

    Dr Prasad - Rest in peace.

    GP hero remains in charge until his sad passing.

    Where is the Daily Mail with this headline?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Come on fellas you could have easily faked a signature and saved this whole fiasco.
    Use some nouse

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mandy dingle

    We could not have faked the signature
    However NHSE could have back dated and you are right added his signature. But that’s the point here they chose not to but have back dated contracts before ! They do what suits them !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NHSE has no interest in keeping the practice opened. They dont care about gps and patients.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say