This site is intended for health professionals only
Thursday 24 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

The challenge of putting the 'me' into CCG

24 Oct 2011

Public and patient engagement(PPE) is playing an increasingly important role in healthcare.  Not only does it provide commissioners and providers with information to help shape local services, but it provides patients and taxpayers with an opportunity to be involved in decisions about care .

The NHS Act 2006 already places a statutory duty on all NHS organisations to involve patients and their representatives in decisions about services. Under the Health and Social Care Bill's proposals, all new CCGs are expected to have an approach to engagement in place before achieving authorisation by the NHS Commissioning Board.

 

The experiences of some pathfinders that have already made headway on local PPE plans suggests  that while successful engagement requires some effort to get up and running initially, once established it need not add significantly to workload. Participants in a recent NHS Confederation round table discussion on engagement felt significant commitment to PPE already exists within many CCGs.

 

The approaches used to date by the NHS all require an investment of time, capacity and money to be successful. And depending on the level of management allowance made available to CCGs, there may not be sufficient resources for all commissioning groups to undertake extensive engagement work in relation to every aspect of their commissioning activities. Possible solutions to this problem include undertaking PPE work at a ‘federated' level across several CCGs in order to make it cost effective, drawing on any available PCT cluster resource, being innovative and entrepreneurial in identifying other funding locally or nationally and/or using local existing groups.

 

GPs new responsibility for commissioning means they will have to consider issues on a wider scale than the traditional practice footprint. They will be planning for whole communities, not just individual practice populations and these communities will be greater than the sum of individual member CCG practice lists. They may also include groups that are not at present well-represented in engagement exercises, and patients who are not registered with a GP or people who are not themselves receiving treatment.

 

In addition to existing practice-based patient participation groups, commissioners can make use of community-based organisations such as Local Improvement Networks (LINks),  third sector organisations, certain existing local authority schemes used to inform strategic planning, and in the future local HealthWatch bodies and Health and Wellbeing Boards.  Foundation trust memberships may also provide a route to engagement, but commissioners will need to interpret their views within the context of members' affiliation to their foundation trust.

 

Regardless of the approach to engaging with communities, there are a number of factors to be considered if PPE work is to be successful. Most importantly, leader-level support must be present in CCG organisations, along with an understanding of the benefits that engagement can bring. Clarity of purpose is also vital - people will not want to get involved in a time consuming process unless they are clear about what it is setting out to achieve. Engagement requires  time and effort, so the commitment should not be underestimated but experience suggests it does ultimately reap long term rewards.

 

Patient and public engagement must be at the heart of planning, commissioning and delivering care in the 'new world' NHS. Without it, CCGs  will find it more difficult to deliver the large efficiency savings required and to design services  tailored to suit the needs of the local community. The support of patients will be critical when  difficult decisions, such as those concerning the reconfiguration of services, have to be made.

 

David Stout is deputy chief executive,  NHS Confederation

READERS' COMMENTS

Derek Bradbury, Work for third sector,
26 Oct 2011
There is a glaring gap in most central advice on PPE and this report of David Stout’s views is no exception. Consulting patients in a reliable, unbiased way requires some expertise in survey methodology, in planning the whole process and particularly in sound selection procedures. Otherwise the results are likely to be biased in unknown ways and lead to misallocation of resources.

As an experienced survey statistician, now retired but working as a volunteer with local practices, I have observed how the DES on patient participation can lead to very poor methods. Indeed the DES is downright misleading in several ways, not least in its “reasonable person” criterion of judging the validity of methods and results, in a field which is notorious for its non-intuitive aspects and which has proven methods based on many years of professional expertise. The DES contrasts with the way the NHS has commissioned reliable researchers such as Ipsos MORI and the Picker Institute for specific national surveys. Good survey planning and execution is not beyond an intelligent practice manager, but suitable training is needed.

The same criticism applies more broadly to public engagement. Neither LINk personnel nor PPE officials in PCTs are appropriately trained for this, other than by accident of their background. There are examples of LINk surveys of public opinion which despite their eye-catching colour charts are actually meaningless because of biased selection. Further, the “engagement” of allegedly representative bodies is fraught with the difficulties of allowing for such an organisation’s own agenda and protection of funding. The transformation into Healthwatches would be a good time to have a very close look at how good methods can be inculcated instead of just issuing warm general words and provoking countless amateur solutions to technical questions of procedure on which there is ample textbook material available.

Derek Bradbury
chartered statistician, chartered scientist.
bradbury@tesco.net
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

LATEST FORUM POSTS