Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

CCGs to be given green light to agree local QOF deals

CCGs will be allowed to replace the national QOF agreement with their own locally agreed deals without NHS England approval, under new proposals announced by NHS England today.

In its board papers, NHS England opened the door for regions across the country to develop their own deals, similar to that announced in Somerset last year, as part of its plans to allow CCGs to ‘co-commission’ primary care.

Under the proposals, which will be finalised at the board meeting on Thursday 6 November, GPs will still have the right to continue with the nationally agreed QOF deal, regardless of whether their CCG has introduced a local deal.

The Proposed next steps towards primary care co-commissioning document sets out the parameters around what areas of primary care CCGs will be able to commission, after NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens outlined plans earlier this year to give commissioning groups greater responsibility.

As part of the proposals, CCGs will be able to take on responsibility for procurement of new practices.

It also proposes that the committees responsible for co-commissioning within CCGs must not be chaired by clinicians, and must not have a GP majority in an attempt to manage potential conflicts of interest.

The proposals on locally negotiated quality programmes would allow CCGs to establish a regional scheme without NHS approval, though it recommends ‘any CCG who wishes to develop a local incentive scheme is expected to first consult with the Local Medical Committee’.

The proposals would open the door for more regions to deviate from national arrangements, as currently being piloted in Somerset where two-thirds of practices opted to drop the QOF.

The paper states: ‘At present, NHS England has policies in place to ensure national sign-off on any variation to national incentive schemes. However, the introduction of co-commissioning brings in local partners - CCGs - and offers them the opportunity to take on the decision-making and responsibilities of primary care commissioning, either jointly with NHS England, or independently, through delegated commissioning arrangements. The purpose of primary care co-commissioning policy is to enable clinically led, optimal local solutions… we are legitimising CCGs being able to make these decisions without them needing to go through a case by case approvals process.’

It adds: ‘Under delegated arrangements, CCGs would have the ability to offer GP practices the opportunity to set the strategic direction for quality by providing a locally commissioned service or participating in a locally designed incentive scheme.

‘This is without prejudice to the rights of practices to their GMS entitlements being negotiated and agreed nationally.

‘Any migration from a national standard contract to a local contract could only be affected through voluntary action.’

The GPC has previously urged caution over local schemes, saying it could have the ‘unintended consequence, of GPs doing the same work, for less resources, and then having to work hard to earn that resource back.’

Dr Richard Vautrey, deputy chair of the GPC, told Pulse today: ‘In many ways, it’s just reinstating the powers that PCTs had over contracts. And it’s yet another sign of the direction, moving back to PCTs, that we’re seeing as NHS England devolves responsibilities.

‘I think the key thing is whether CCGs exert that power, and whether practices want that, and whether there is genuinely a relaxation or push from the centre. That’s what we didn’t see with the Department of Health and PCTs previously, that’s why – despite their ability to do so – PCTs didn’t abandon QOF in any significant way, although they had the powers to do so.’

Dr Mike Dixon, chair of NHS Alliance, said it was an ‘excellent’ development.

He said: ‘It seems to me increasingly, GP remuneration is going to be a mix of local and national, I think the QOF has become too inflexible, and too often a question of point-scoring and tick-boxing. And I think that’s excellent, that’s completely the way forward. That’s what Somerset’s done is what now needs to happen elsewhere if people want it.’

Related images

  • accounts pay qof

Readers' comments (10)

  • "must not be chaired by clinicians, and must not have a GP majority "
    I can see why but the daily wail will still say GPs are in charge of the budget to commission services which they are obviously not- That 's another fine mess....!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Would have been good last year - but next year its far too little - far too late to hold back the "abcense of patient care Tsunami" that is going to hit the NHS next year as UK General Practice collapses in the big cities, and secondary care, despite the lions share of NHS funding over last 10 yrs, finds out they can't cope without somebody else looking after the other 90% of illnes episodes each day.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I welcome our non-medical committee men overlords.

    This is actually going to be quite funny (unless of course you are a patient)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • but what do somerset actually do instead?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So it's going to be decided by group of people with no clinical knowledge and with no knowledge of primary care?

    I'm tempted to say that's no different to - except any success will be credited to the government and any failure will be attributed to the CCG (I.e.GPs). Oh and any reduction in work load will be headlined as "fat cat GPs doing less work" by daily mail.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bob Hodges

    With the recruitment situation for practice nurses looking bleaker than that for finding new GPs, then this could be welcome if the replacemement is less 'chronic-disease tick-boxy'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interesting!! How will practices be paid for local QOF - will GPES be capable of extracting reports for 200+ CCGs??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • you'll still have to do the qof work and it will still be checked.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "As part of the proposals, CCGs will be able to take on responsibility for procurement of new practices."
    Is that new - as in practices to serve massive housing increase plans - or 'new' as in 'too many practices have been forced to close for financial/recruitment/both problems - and NHS England doesn't want to address the problem of inadequate GP provision'?
    btw - how will this be financed & who will hold the contracts?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is just another trap for more work for no more funding. The day to day review of hypertensives, diabetics etc will continue, unrewarded through QOF. Meanwhile CCGs will come up with more and more time consuming reviews of this and that making it harder and less worthwhile to claw the funding back.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say