Linking of GP and hospital records needed to spot rare vaccine effects, says Covid inquiry
The development and rollout of Covid-19 vaccines during the pandemic was an ‘extraordinary feat’ that saved hundreds of thousands of lives in the UK, the Covid inquiry has found.
But its latest instalment, published today, added that ahead of future pandemics the NHS needs to improve links between GP and hospital records in order to be able to monitor vaccine safety.
The inquiry heard from a number of witnesses that improvements could be made when it came to the ‘linkage of electronic healthcare data’ and found that there was ‘insufficient linkage’ between GP practice and hospital records.
England’s chief medical offer Professor Chris Whitty told the inquiry that there had always been a difficulty in ‘linking up primary care data, general practice data, with secondary care data’ and that such linkage was crucial in order to ‘identify rare adverse effects’.
The inquiry report said: ‘While the UK’s systems and processes responded effectively to vaccine safety issues, the inquiry concludes that there is nevertheless scope for improvement. This is particularly the case in relation to electronic healthcare records.’
Vaccines and the quick identification of effective treatments such as dexamethasone are ‘two of the success stories of the pandemic’, UK Covid-19 Inquiry chair Baroness Hallett said.
Yet disparities in uptake of vaccination in communities with greater levels of deprivation and in some ethnic minority groups were ‘predictable’ and must be addressed before the next pandemic, she added.
Module 4 of the inquiry, on vaccines and therapeutics heard that the UK’s position as a world leader in biomedical sciences set it in good stead for developing and rolling out effective vaccines at scale within a year of the first case of Covid-19 being reported.
The UK developed the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine and authorised two others. One study estimated almost 450,000 lives were saved by the vaccination programme in England alone.
In 2021, approximately 132 million Covid-19 vaccinations were given across the four nations, making it the largest vaccination programme in UK history and by June 2022 about 87% of the UK population aged over 12 years had been vaccinated with two doses, the report said.
Likewise, dexamethasone was being used to save the lives of hospitalised Covid-19 patients by June 2020, within hours of trial results confirming its effectiveness.
By the following March, it is estimated to have saved 22,000 lives in the UK and one million across the globe.
But Baroness Hallett said a lack of confidence in Covid-19 vaccines driven by the spread of false information online and compounded by their rapid development was a global issue.
Coupled with an underlying lack of trust in governments and health systems across the UK made some communities more susceptible to false information.
She called on action to be taken across all four nations to tackle rising vaccine hesitancy and build trust within communities with lower vaccine uptake and to improve access to vaccines before the next pandemic.
The inquiry found that there had been ‘rigorous trialling and regulatory approval’ of the vaccines as well as effective systems in place to assess the ongoing safety and efficacy of the jabs during the pandemic.
But it concluded that the current Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme is not sufficiently supportive of those who suffered serious harm as a result of vaccination and requires urgent reform.
Those who suffered harm were a small minority compared to the overall scale of the vaccination programme, ‘but of no less importance to the individuals affected and their families’, she said.
The inquiry also found that mandatory vaccination for care home staff is likely to have contributed to alienation and increased vaccine hesitancy in some groups.
‘It would have been more effective to focus on co-delivery of vaccinations to staff and patients in care homes, along with targeted schemes to increase vaccine confidence among health and social care workers in areas of lower uptake’, the report said.
‘The vaccination programme was an extraordinary feat. Effective vaccines were developed, produced and delivered to the majority of the population in record time,’ Baroness Hallett, said.
‘However, while the majority of people took up the offer of vaccination, there was lower uptake within communities in areas of higher deprivation and in some ethnic minority communities.
‘Governments and health services must work with communities to rebuild trust and promote a better understanding of, and confidence in, vaccines.’
The inquiry also found that the UK entered the pandemic without sufficient manufacturing capability.
Strategic thinking across government is needed to ensure a diverse range of vaccine and therapeutic technologies are at the UK’s disposal in the event of a future pandemic, it concluded.
Measures to boost vaccine uptake should include targeted strategies and communications and improving monitoring and evaluation of vaccine uptake and delivery to better understand the measures proven to be effective in increasing vaccine uptake.
For routine vaccination, each nation should set and regularly review its minimum acceptable standards of vaccine uptake, which would trigger targeted uptake campaigns, it added.
Regulatory bodies should also be given easier access to healthcare records for post-authorisation safety monitoring of new vaccines and therapeutics, the inquiry said.
Messaging about eligibility criteria for vaccination and therapeutics such as antivirals should be clear and easily understandable, it found.
Module 3 of the Covid-19 inquiry published in March found that pandemic initiatives with significant GP involvement such as the shielding programme and vaccination provision ‘worsened GP wellbeing’ and ‘increased levels of burnout’.
BMA council chair Dr Tom Dolphin said: ‘GPs moved heaven and earth to quickly set up vaccination programmes to protect the most vulnerable in their local communities, using their proven track record of consistently running routine vaccination services year-in-year out. It’s vital that practices’ expertise and trusted relationships with local patients are fostered, and the value of continuity of care is not disregarded.
‘Overall, the vaccination effort, alongside the wider pandemic response and the need to maintain non-Covid care, required staff to go above and beyond. This pressure on the workforce and other services must be factored into any pandemic planning, a point that unfortunately seems lacking in today’s report.
‘The report illustrates the need to continue investing in research and development, as well as public health, community health and prevention, and the importance of engaging with communities, to ensure health messaging reaches the right people in the right way.’
Visit Pulse Reference for details on 140 symptoms, including easily searchable symptoms and categories, offering you a free platform to check symptoms and receive potential diagnoses during consultations.
Related Articles
READERS' COMMENTS [2]
Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles


No other reason ?
Now we understand the plan for the creation of Neighbourhood Health care facilities advertised as ways to improve primary care and patient experience.
After having read the comments on that article of colleagues who didn’t find much sense in that decision, it becomes clearer that probably these are part of the planning for future pandaemics to be used as vaccination centres rather than truly for improvement of the existing underfunding of Primary Care.
This and the recent decision to take responsibility away from General Practice in relation to the GDPR rules around the new automatic opt – in for the share of patient data (unless you opt out using type 1 objection – of which the vast majority of the population is unaware), it all starts to make sense.
It’s beginning to look like future pandemic planning is probably government’s first priority now, ahead of the current day to day problems most of our colleagues are facing.