This site is intended for health professionals only


‘GPs cannot deliver fit note reform on their own’

‘GPs cannot deliver fit note reform on their own’
Getty

Fit notes need backing beyond what GPs can offer if they are to support a return to work, argues Health Foundation policy and research manager Sam Atwell

Working‑age health has climbed sharply up the Government’s agenda. More than four million people are now in work with a work‑limiting health condition, and ministers are increasingly concerned about the rising cost of health‑related benefits. Against this backdrop, employment minister Dame Diana Johnson signalled in March that the Government is considering reforms to Med3 forms, better known as fit notes.

Fit notes were introduced in 2010 to replace the old ‘sick note’ system, which was criticised for offering a binary choice between staying in work and being signed off sick. The aim was to give health professionals more scope to say when someone might be fit for work with the right adjustments, and to advise employers on changes that could help them remain in or return to work.

In reality, very little has changed. Of the 11.2 million fit notes issued in 2024/25, less than 7% included advice on how a patient might return to work. The Government’s recent Keep Britain Working review argued that fit notes often create ‘distance’ between employers and employees, instead of early intervention and constructive conversation.

This is a missed opportunity. A key problem is that GPs, who still issue most fit notes, often lack the time and specialist support needed to make the system work as intended.

GPs still play a crucial role. Their relationships with patients can give them a rounded understanding of people’s lives, and allow them to offer trusted, impartial advice. But with appointments still typically lasting around 10 minutes, and fewer patients seeing the same GP consistently over time, many GPs, in practice, have limited scope to explore how a person’s health affects their ability to work.

There is also a question of training. Although recent data is limited, 2012 evidence found that only 10% of GPs in England had received work and health training in the previous 12 months. More fundamentally, useful conversations about work capacity often require knowledge of different workplaces, job demands and adjustments that goes beyond what GPs could reasonably be expected to know.

An effective system for helping people stay in or return to work will require joined-up conversations between healthcare professionals providing clinical input, employers, employees and other relevant services, such as transport or social care.

One option reportedly under consideration is shifting responsibility for fit notes away from clinicians and towards non-clinical health and work professionals. This would need careful testing to ensure decisions are informed by appropriate clinical input. But it could move the UK closer to models used in countries such as the Netherlands and Denmark, where ‘caseworkers’ play a central role in supporting returns to work.

In these systems, independent experts, employed by public bodies or third-party providers, stay in contact with the individual, identify barriers to work with clinical input where needed, triage people to services and give employers practical advice on supporting a successful return.

Both the Health Foundation’s Commission for Healthier Working Lives and the Keep Britain Working review recently highlighted caseworker models as promising, though underdeveloped in the UK. Access to workplace health support remains far lower than in many European countries. And while WorkWell pilots are testing new models of work and health advice, they are still early stage and limited to 15 areas of England, with plans to expand further in the coming years.

The challenge now is scale. Policymakers need to build capacity for caseworker support, so that conversations among employees, employers and health services are better coordinated, while retaining a clear role for clinical input.

One option for the longer term would be for fit notes to operate as referrals to independent caseworker support. In the near term, there is scope to build on co-location models that place specialist work and health advisers in GP practices and other health settings, which may require additional investment.

Whichever direction the Government takes, the lesson of recent reforms is that without addressing the lack of capacity and expertise in the system, fit notes will continue to be primarily the gateway to workplace absence, rather than a tool to prevent it.

Sam Atwell is policy and research manager at the Health Foundation


			

Have you got a view you want to share with Pulse?

We’re always open to first-hand pieces and opinions from GPs.
Email your piece for consideration to be published on our site.

READERS' COMMENTS [5]

Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles

Edoardo Cervoni 1 May, 2026 9:07 pm

Sam Atwell is right to argue that fit notes are failing to support a meaningful return to work. The data are clear: despite their original purpose, they remain overwhelmingly a mechanism for certifying absence rather than facilitating recovery and reintegration. Where his analysis is particularly strong is in identifying the practical constraints: limited time, limited training, and limited workplace insight that prevent GPs from delivering on the system’s ambitions.
But his proposed solution risks addressing the symptoms rather than the cause.
The central issue is not simply that GPs lack time or expertise. It is that they occupy a role they were never designed to fulfil. The fit note system asks clinicians to act as de facto occupational health assessors, despite having neither the training nor the contextual information required to do so effectively. No amount of co-location or additional advisory layers can fully resolve this mismatch.
More importantly, GP involvement is not just a matter of convenience, but a legal and ethical construct. It exists to ensure equitable access to certification and protection, particularly for the large proportion of the workforce without occupational health support. Any move to shift responsibility toward non-clinical caseworkers must confront a difficult question: how do we preserve equity and clinical accountability while redistributing authority?
This is where current reform discussions remain underdeveloped.
There is a more coherent path forward. GPs should retain a limited, clearly defined role: establishing the initial clinical legitimacy of the Med3. Instead, longer-term work capacity assessment is transferred to appropriately trained specialists. This preserves the legal and ethical foundations of the system while recognising its practical limits. Without such clarity, we risk perpetuating a model that satisfies neither patients, clinicians, nor employers.
Fit notes were designed to move us beyond the binary of “sick” versus “fit.” Fifteen years on, they remain trapped within it.

David Church 1 May, 2026 10:34 pm

Why don’t GPs put advice on fit notes on how patients can return to work?
Because employers reject them and insist on having an ‘unfit for all work’ note – since they can get mor money off government for one like that !
Perhaps Sam Atwell can work on that aspect for the beneift of patients (and GPs) ?

Simon Gilbert 5 May, 2026 8:11 am

Work absence is almost entirely related to incentives.
We should just admit we have defacto basic income option, albeit it just involves becoming sick and using a lot of medical and bureaucratic time.
Bring in a negative income tax at the lower bands for UK citizens and you would save billions whilst allowing people to pick up jobs and hours they are suited to.
Get rid of housing benefit at the same time to stop benefit payments being the floor to push up housing costs for all.

DJ Marlow 5 May, 2026 2:49 pm

Sam Atwell thinks GPs occupy the same double-digit range of IQ he does. GPs know exactly what the game is; the game is avoiding confrontation and not making work harder than it needs to be. Patients already have an agenda. There’s too much at stake for people not to have a sick note; we are indeed the gateway to financial support. The patient is advising what to put on the note. The only question we need to ask a patient is how long is the note for.

adnan masood 6 May, 2026 7:17 am

with the advent and push for online consulting together with massive time pressure on GPs the 10 min appointment for a sick note is a fantasy. now it’s as easy as ordering and Uber eats and we do not have time for the scrutiny expected.